Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals RSS Feed

Toward Shared Stewardship of America’s Public Lands

Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:40:36 GMT

Toward Shared Stewardship of America’s Public Lands

Moving Beyond Control to Collaboration

Debates over who should manage America’s public lands often frame the issue as a choice between federal authority and state control. In practice, this framing oversimplifies a far more complex reality. Public lands are shaped by overlapping jurisdictions, shared responsibilities, and partnerships that already blur the lines between levels of government. The question is not whether authority should reside in one place or another, but how stewardship can be structured to balance access, conservation, and long term responsibility.

Federal land management has historically provided consistency, durability, and protection at scale. National standards help safeguard ecosystems that cross political boundaries and ensure that public lands remain public across generations. At the same time, centralized systems can struggle to respond quickly to local conditions, evolving recreation patterns, and community specific needs. State led approaches, by contrast, offer flexibility, proximity, and opportunities for alignment with regional priorities, but they also raise concerns about capacity, funding stability, and uneven conservation outcomes.

Rather than viewing these models as mutually exclusive, a shared stewardship approach recognizes that effective land management often emerges from collaboration. Many of the most successful public land initiatives already rely on cooperative agreements among federal agencies, state governments, tribal nations, local communities, nonprofits, and private partners. These arrangements allow authority, expertise, and resources to be distributed in ways that reflect both local knowledge and broader public interests.

Shared stewardship emphasizes governance over ownership. It shifts attention away from who holds title to land and toward how decisions are made, who participates in those decisions, and what values guide them. Under this framework, federal agencies retain responsibility for long term conservation and national priorities, while states and local partners play meaningful roles in planning, implementation, and adaptive management. This approach can preserve consistency while allowing for innovation and responsiveness.

For outdoor recreation, shared stewardship offers a pathway to balance access and protection. Recreation infrastructure, visitor management, and community partnerships often benefit from local leadership and regional coordination. At the same time, ecological monitoring, habitat protection, and landscape scale planning require continuity and scientific rigor that national systems are well positioned to provide. Aligning these strengths requires intentional collaboration rather than jurisdictional competition.

This model also places a premium on transparency and accountability. Shared stewardship works only when roles are clearly defined, funding mechanisms are stable, and outcomes are evaluated over time. Without these safeguards, partnerships risk becoming symbolic rather than substantive. Successful collaboration demands sustained investment in communication, data sharing, and trust building across agencies and sectors.

Universities and applied research institutions have an important role to play in this landscape. By serving as neutral conveners, knowledge brokers, and workforce trainers, they can support evidence based decision making and help bridge gaps between policy and practice. Research that integrates ecological science, recreation management, and community economics is particularly valuable in informing adaptive governance models.

Ultimately, the future of public land stewardship will be shaped less by jurisdictional boundaries than by collective capacity. Climate change, biodiversity loss, and rising recreation demand are challenges that no single agency or level of government can address alone. Shared stewardship acknowledges this reality and offers a framework for cooperation that respects both local insight and national responsibility.

Public lands are among the most enduring public investments in American history. Preserving their ecological integrity and public value requires moving beyond debates about control and toward conversations about collaboration. By focusing on shared responsibility rather than competing authority, land managers, recreation professionals, and policymakers can work toward systems that are resilient, inclusive, and worthy of the landscapes they serve.

What Shifting Public Land Governance Means for Outdoor Recreation Professionals

Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:38:50 GMT

What Shifting Public Land Governance Means for Outdoor Recreation Professionals

A Field Being Asked to Adapt in Real Time

For outdoor recreation and natural resource professionals, debates over who manages public lands are not abstract policy conversations. They are shaping day to day work, long term career paths, and the skills required to remain effective in a rapidly changing field. As authority, access, and expectations shift, so too does the professional landscape.

One of the most immediate implications is increased complexity. Recreation professionals are now navigating management systems that vary widely by jurisdiction, funding structure, and political context. Where federal agencies once provided a relatively consistent framework, professionals may now find themselves working across multiple state led systems, each with its own permitting processes, performance metrics, and stakeholder expectations. This fragmentation requires greater adaptability and a deeper understanding of governance, policy, and interagency coordination.

The role of outdoor recreation professionals is also expanding beyond traditional management and operations. Increasingly, professionals are being asked to serve as translators between competing interests. Balancing recreation access, conservation priorities, community economic goals, and political realities requires skills that extend well beyond trail design or resource monitoring. Communication, facilitation, and conflict resolution are becoming central competencies, particularly as public lands attract more users and more scrutiny.

Economic considerations are playing a larger role in professional decision making. As states seek to align land management with economic development, recreation professionals are often tasked with demonstrating return on investment, supporting tourism strategies, and justifying infrastructure investments. That shift places new emphasis on economic impact analysis, partnership development, and grant acquisition. Professionals who can connect recreation outcomes to broader community benefits are increasingly valued.

Workforce expectations are also changing. In some settings, professionals are managing expanded responsibilities without corresponding increases in staffing or funding. In others, they are operating within entrepreneurial models that emphasize revenue generation through permits, concessions, and partnerships. These environments reward innovation and flexibility, but they can also increase burnout and blur the line between stewardship and commercialization. Navigating that tension is becoming a defining challenge of the profession.

Education and training pathways must evolve alongside these changes. Technical skills remain essential, but they are no longer sufficient on their own. Future professionals need grounding in policy analysis, public administration, community planning, and applied research. They also need experience working across sectors, including nonprofits, private operators, and local governments. Universities and training programs play a critical role in preparing graduates for this more interdisciplinary and politically complex landscape.

Ethical considerations are also coming to the forefront. As access expands and revenue models grow more prominent, professionals must grapple with questions about equity, inclusion, and public trust. Who benefits from expanded access. Who is left out. How are decisions justified and communicated. Maintaining legitimacy requires transparency and a clear commitment to public service values, regardless of governance structure.

Despite these challenges, this period of transition also presents opportunity. Outdoor recreation professionals are uniquely positioned to shape how land management evolves. Their on the ground experience provides insight into what works, what fails, and what unintended consequences emerge over time. Professionals who engage proactively in policy discussions, research partnerships, and community planning efforts can help ensure that changes in governance lead to better outcomes rather than reactive compromises.

Perhaps most importantly, this moment calls for professional leadership. As public lands become sites of intensified debate, outdoor recreation professionals are often among the most trusted voices in the room. Their ability to ground conversations in evidence, experience, and long term perspective is essential. Whether working within federal agencies, state systems, universities, or local organizations, their role in shaping the future of public lands has never been more consequential.

The governance structures surrounding public lands may continue to shift, but the core mission of outdoor recreation and natural resource professionals remains the same. To steward land responsibly, facilitate meaningful access, and ensure that public resources serve both present and future generations. Adapting to change while holding fast to that mission will define the profession in the years ahead.

The Risks of Shifting Public Lands to State Control

Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:36:52 GMT

The Risks of Shifting Public Lands to State Control

Capacity, Consistency, and the Fragility of Long Term Stewardship

While arguments for expanded state control of public lands emphasize flexibility, local knowledge, and economic opportunity, the concerns raised by critics are equally substantive. These concerns are not rooted in resistance to change, but in questions of capacity, consistency, and long term responsibility. As management authority shifts closer to the local level, the safeguards built into federal systems may become harder to sustain.

One of the most significant challenges is uneven capacity across states. Federal land agencies operate at a national scale, supported by stable funding streams, standardized training systems, and decades of institutional knowledge. State agencies vary widely in staffing levels, budget stability, and technical expertise. Some states are well equipped to manage large and complex landscapes. Others already struggle to maintain existing state parks, wildlife areas, and recreation infrastructure. Expanding responsibilities without equivalent and durable funding raises concerns about whether states can realistically absorb additional land management duties over time.

Funding instability is a closely related issue. Federal land agencies benefit from appropriations that, while often insufficient, are at least structured around long term national commitments. State budgets are more vulnerable to economic downturns, political shifts, and competing priorities such as education, healthcare, and transportation. When revenues decline, conservation and recreation funding are often among the first areas to be reduced. This creates a risk that public lands managed at the state level could experience cycles of underinvestment, deferred maintenance, and diminished enforcement.

Consistency in conservation standards is another central concern. Federal land management provides a baseline of protections that apply across ecosystems and political boundaries. These standards are particularly important for migratory wildlife, watershed protection, and landscape scale ecological processes that do not align neatly with state borders. Shifting authority to individual states can lead to fragmented management approaches, where protections vary significantly from one jurisdiction to another. Over time, this patchwork can undermine broader conservation goals and weaken ecosystem resilience.

Critics also point to political pressure as a complicating factor. State agencies are often more directly exposed to short term political and economic demands, particularly in regions where public lands represent a significant share of the tax base or development potential. Decisions about leasing, permitting, and access may be influenced by immediate economic needs rather than long term ecological considerations. While federal agencies are not immune to political influence, their distance from local pressures can sometimes provide insulation for unpopular but necessary conservation decisions.

Public access and equity present additional challenges. Expanded permitting and leasing can improve access for some users while restricting it for others. Fee based systems, exclusive concessions, and privatized access arrangements may unintentionally favor commercial operators or higher income users. Without careful oversight, public lands risk becoming less public in practice, even if they remain publicly owned. Ensuring equitable access requires deliberate policy choices and sustained investment, both of which can be difficult to maintain amid shifting political priorities.

Wildlife and habitat protection remain central to these debates. Many species depend on large, contiguous landscapes that cross multiple jurisdictions. Federal management has historically played a key role in maintaining habitat connectivity and enforcing protections for threatened and endangered species. State led systems may face greater challenges balancing these responsibilities alongside economic development goals, particularly when conservation measures are perceived as limiting local opportunity.

There is also concern about institutional memory and scientific continuity. Federal agencies maintain extensive research partnerships, long term monitoring programs, and data repositories that inform adaptive management. Fragmenting authority across states risks disrupting these systems, particularly if data standards, research priorities, and monitoring protocols diverge. Over time, this can weaken the scientific foundation that supports effective land management decisions.

None of these concerns suggest that federal land management is flawless or that states lack the ability to manage public lands responsibly. Rather, they highlight the tradeoffs inherent in shifting authority. Efficiency gains achieved through localized decision making may come at the cost of consistency, stability, and long term ecological safeguards. These tradeoffs are often difficult to reverse once authority has been transferred.

At its core, the debate over state control of public lands is not simply about governance structures. It is about values. It asks whether society is willing to prioritize long term stewardship over short term gains, whether conservation should be buffered from political cycles, and how public lands should serve future generations as well as present needs.

As pressures on public lands continue to grow, these questions will only become more urgent. Understanding the risks associated with shifting management authority is essential for informed decision making. Thoughtful stewardship requires not only flexibility and responsiveness, but also durability, restraint, and a clear commitment to the public good over time.

The Case for State Control of Public Lands

Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:35:03 GMT

The Case for State Control of Public Lands

Local Knowledge, Flexible Management, and the Promise of Expanded Access

As debates over public land management intensify, one argument continues to gain traction. States may be better positioned than federal agencies to manage large portions of America’s public lands. Advocates of expanded state control point not to ideology, but to practicality, arguing that proximity, flexibility, and responsiveness matter in ways centralized systems often struggle to match.

At its core, this perspective is rooted in the belief that land management works best when decision makers are closer to the landscapes and communities they serve. State agencies are often embedded within regional ecological systems, economic realities, and cultural expectations. They work alongside local governments, landowners, outfitters, and user groups in ways that federal agencies, constrained by national mandates and layered approval processes, often cannot.

One of the strongest arguments for state led management is responsiveness. Federal land agencies operate within complex regulatory frameworks designed to ensure consistency and accountability across millions of acres and multiple states. While these systems provide important safeguards, they also slow decision making. Routine actions such as trail reroutes, access adjustments, and infrastructure upgrades can take years to move from proposal to implementation. States argue that they can act more quickly, adapting to changing conditions such as wildfire risk, flooding, erosion, or surging recreational demand without becoming mired in procedural delays.

Closely related is the issue of local knowledge. State agencies frequently employ professionals who live in the regions they manage, understand seasonal use patterns, and maintain longstanding relationships with local stakeholders. This proximity can lead to more context sensitive decisions, particularly in areas where recreation, conservation, and economic development intersect. Rather than applying uniform policies across vast and diverse landscapes, states can tailor management approaches to reflect regional priorities and constraints.

Economic development is another central component of the state control argument. Many rural and gateway communities depend heavily on public lands, yet feel disconnected from decisions that shape their economic futures. Expanded state authority can allow for more intentional alignment between land management and community development goals. Increased access, expanded permitting for guides and outfitters, and targeted recreation infrastructure investments are often framed as tools for supporting local economies while maintaining public ownership.

Outdoor recreation plays a particularly important role in this discussion. Participation has grown steadily over the past decade, and in many regions demand now exceeds available infrastructure. States contend that expanded authority allows them to address gaps more efficiently, developing trail systems, campgrounds, access points, and visitor services in ways that better match regional recreation patterns. For users, this can translate into more opportunities, reduced crowding, and improved experiences.

Permitting and leasing are often cited as areas where states can provide greater flexibility. Federal systems are designed to manage risk at scale, which can make it difficult for small operators or emerging recreation sectors to navigate the process. State managed permits may be more accessible to local businesses, lowering barriers to entry for guides, outfitters, and concessionaires while keeping economic benefits closer to home.

There is also a fiscal argument at play. Federal land agencies face persistent funding challenges, including maintenance backlogs that total billions of dollars. States argue that taking on greater management authority, particularly when paired with revenue generating activities, can create more sustainable funding models. Fees, leases, and partnerships can be reinvested directly into land management, infrastructure, and enforcement rather than filtered through national budgets and competing priorities.

From a governance perspective, proponents of state control often emphasize accountability. State agencies answer to governors, legislatures, and constituents who live near and use the land regularly. This visibility, advocates argue, creates incentives for responsive management and continuous improvement. When decisions are made locally, the impacts are felt immediately, reinforcing the need for thoughtful stewardship.

Importantly, calls for expanded state control do not necessarily imply a rejection of conservation. Many state natural resource agencies have strong conservation mandates and long histories of managing wildlife, fisheries, and recreation lands effectively. Supporters argue that states can balance use and protection in ways that reflect both ecological science and local values, particularly when supported by partnerships with universities, nonprofits, and regional planning entities.

None of this suggests that state led management is a universal solution. Capacity varies widely across states, and not all regions have the funding, staffing, or political support necessary to take on expanded responsibilities. Still, for many advocates, the appeal lies in the potential to rethink land management as a more adaptive and regionally grounded endeavor, one that responds to changing conditions rather than relying on static systems.

In an era defined by rapid environmental change, shifting recreation patterns, and mounting pressure on public lands, the case for state control resonates because it offers a sense of agency. It suggests that solutions can emerge from the places most affected, shaped by people who know the land not just as a resource, but as a lived landscape.

Whether or not expanded state authority is the right path forward, the arguments behind it deserve serious consideration. They reflect legitimate frustrations, practical challenges, and a desire for management systems that feel both effective and connected to place. Understanding these perspectives is essential for anyone engaged in the future of outdoor recreation and natural resource stewardship.

Who Should Manage America’s Public Lands?

Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:33:10 GMT

Who Should Manage America’s Public Lands?

Shifting Authority, Expanding Access, and the Questions We’re Not Asking Enough

For more than a century, federally managed public lands have shaped conservation, outdoor recreation, and the American idea of shared natural heritage. National parks, forests, wildlife refuges, and Bureau of Land Management lands have long reflected a national commitment to stewardship that extends beyond state lines and election cycles. Today, that framework is being questioned in new and meaningful ways.

Across the country, conversations are accelerating around transferring federal lands to state ownership or expanding state-led management authority. At the same time, access to public lands is changing. Permits, leases, and concessions for recreation, grazing, energy development, and commercial use are being granted in areas where such activity was once limited or more tightly regulated. Longstanding protections for sensitive lands and wildlife are also facing renewed scrutiny. None of this is happening in isolation. Taken together, these shifts suggest a broader rethinking of how public lands are governed and used.

This moment is not defined by a single policy decision or political cycle. It reflects deeper pressures tied to economic uncertainty, rural development needs, rising demand for outdoor recreation, and growing frustration with federal land management capacity. Federal agencies are stretched thin, facing staffing shortages, deferred maintenance backlogs, and increasingly complex mandates. At the same time, rural and gateway communities are searching for sustainable economic pathways, often turning to outdoor recreation, tourism, and resource-based industries as viable options. In this context, calls for greater state control can appear practical, responsive, and locally grounded.

There is also a political dimension that cannot be ignored. Debates over public lands are closely tied to broader conversations about centralized governance, regulatory authority, and local autonomy. States argue that they are better positioned to respond quickly, tailor management to regional needs, and align land-use decisions with state-level economic and recreation priorities. Critics counter that shifting authority risks fragmenting national conservation goals and weakening protections that exist precisely because they are insulated from local political and economic pressure.

These tensions are not new. Federal land management emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in response to overuse, privatization, and environmental degradation. National oversight was designed to ensure consistency, long-term planning, and protection of landscapes and species deemed significant to the nation as a whole. Yet federal systems have always struggled to fully account for regional variation and local knowledge. The balance between national standards and local realities has been contested since the beginning of the public lands experiment.

What makes the current moment feel different is the scale and speed of change, combined with new stressors such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and unprecedented levels of recreational use. Outdoor recreation now occupies a central place in these debates. Expanded access and streamlined permitting can bring clear benefits, including improved infrastructure, new opportunities for outfitters and guides, and meaningful economic returns for rural communities. At the same time, recreation itself places pressure on land and wildlife, particularly when use increases faster than management capacity and funding.

Who manages public land matters not only for whether access exists, but for how that access is planned, funded, monitored, and sustained. Management decisions shape trail density, visitor experience, wildlife protection, enforcement, and long-term resilience. They also influence who benefits from public lands and who bears the costs when systems are strained.

Too often, conversations about public land management fall into rigid camps. Federal control is framed as either essential or outdated. State control is cast as either empowering or reckless. The reality is far more nuanced. State agencies vary widely in capacity, funding stability, and political insulation. Federal agencies are not monolithic and rely heavily on partnerships with states, tribes, nonprofits, and local communities. The most important questions are not simply about ownership, but about governance, accountability, and values.

Public lands have always reflected national priorities and cultural values. The changes unfolding today invite a careful reassessment of how those priorities are expressed through policy and practice. The challenge ahead is not choosing a single level of government over another, but finding approaches to stewardship that balance access, conservation, economic vitality, and long-term responsibility. How we navigate that balance will shape the future of outdoor recreation and natural resource management for generations.

Workplace Equity Through the Law: Why EEO Still Matters

Thu, 13 Nov 2025 03:34:22 GMT

Workplaces thrive when fairness isn’t just aspirational, it’s foundational. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) laws help create that foundation by ensuring that individuals have a fair chance at employment and advancement, free from discrimination based on protected characteristics like race, sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability. From the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, these legal protections have reshaped the American workplace for the better.

In industries like hospitality, tourism, recreation, and service, where people are central to the experience, fairness and equal access are not only legal requirements; they’re strategic assets. As conversations around workplace equity continue to evolve, it’s essential to distinguish between the legal obligations of EEO laws and the broader organizational strategies often associated with diversity and inclusion. At their core, these laws uphold the right to dignity, access, and opportunity in every workplace.

A Brief History of EEO Protections

Modern protections against workplace discrimination began to take shape during the civil rights era. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark achievement, making it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This set the foundation for a series of additional laws aimed at ensuring a more level playing field in the American workplace.

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 tackled wage disparities between men and women doing the same work, while the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protected older workers from unfair treatment. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) mandated reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities and prohibited exclusion based on disability status. Later, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) guaranteed eligible employees unpaid, job-protected leave for qualified family and health-related reasons.

These laws are not simply historical milestones, they remain critical to how organizations operate today. While the broader discourse on equity and inclusion continues to shift, these statutes form the enduring legal backbone of workplace fairness.

Equality Creates Stronger Teams

Before the establishment of EEO protections, access to professional opportunities was often limited for women, people of color, older adults, and individuals with disabilities. While challenges persist, these laws have significantly reduced overt discrimination and provided legal avenues for addressing bias when it occurs. Beyond legal compliance, fostering fairness in the workplace leads to stronger, more effective teams. Research consistently shows that organizations with varied perspectives, experiences, and problem-solving approaches are more innovative and perform better over time. A 2020 study by McKinsey & Company found that companies with more diverse leadership teams outperformed their less diverse peers on profitability.

Well-known employers like Hyatt, Delta Air Lines, and REI Co-op have embraced inclusive hiring and development practices, not only because they reflect company values but because they improve team performance and strengthen customer relationships. Their success demonstrates that respecting differences, when grounded in clear, lawful hiring and advancement practices, is both good ethics and good business.

A Better Experience for Guests and Employees

In industries like hospitality, tourism, and recreation, where face-to-face service is the cornerstone of success, ensuring fair treatment of employees directly contributes to better guest experiences. EEO laws protect workers from discriminatory practices and help create environments where staff feel respected, supported, and motivated to do their best work.

For example, employing multilingual staff or individuals from different cultural backgrounds can improve communication with international guests and foster innovative solutions to customer service challenges. These are not just ethical advantages, they’re competitive ones. Companies that value inclusive staffing are better equipped to adapt to diverse client needs and expand their market reach.

Respecting employee rights and ensuring equitable treatment also led to lower turnover, higher morale, and improved performance. Conversely, workplaces where favoritism or exclusion goes unchecked often struggle with burnout, staff dissatisfaction, and inconsistent service quality. Hilton Hotels, frequently recognized among the best places to work, has invested in fair promotion systems and support structures like its “Open Doors” mentorship program to help ensure all employees have access to advancement opportunities.

By grounding employee support in clear policies and legal protections, companies not only fulfill their obligations, they strengthen their operations from the inside out.

Recruitment and Reputation

Today’s job seekers are looking for more than just a paycheck, they want to work for organizations that operate with integrity, fairness, and transparency. Companies that align their hiring practices with EEO standards are better positioned to attract and retain high-quality candidates from a broad range of backgrounds. Clear, well-structured recruitment processes help ensure that hiring decisions are based on merit and ability, rather than bias or assumptions. By eliminating unnecessary barriers and focusing on job-related criteria, employers not only reduce legal risk but also build stronger, more capable teams. Inclusive hiring isn’t about fulfilling a quota, it’s about recognizing the value of talent wherever it exists.

Technology is playing a growing role in this effort. Recruiting platforms such as LinkedIn Talent Insights and Greenhouse offer tools that allow HR professionals to track hiring data, review outcomes, and adjust practices to better align with equal opportunity principles. These innovations support compliance while helping organizations stay competitive in a tight labor market. Ultimately, a reputation for fairness strengthens an employer’s brand, not just with job candidates, but with customers, partners, and the public. When organizations demonstrate a commitment to fair hiring and advancement practices, they build credibility and trust that benefits everyone.

Moving Toward a More Equitable Future

At their core, equal employment opportunity laws are about fairness, dignity, and the right to be considered based on one’s skills, not one’s background. These laws continue to provide critical safeguards in a world where bias, though less visible than in the past, can still shape outcomes.

For industries that rely heavily on human interaction, like hospitality, tourism, and recreation, workplace fairness is more than a legal obligation; it’s the key to strong employee engagement and exceptional guest service. When organizations commit to ensuring that every employee is treated with respect and given a fair chance to grow, the benefits ripple outward. Employees become more invested. Customers receive better experiences. And businesses earn lasting loyalty.

While broader social conversations about workplace equity continue to evolve, the legal framework of EEO remains clear: discrimination has no place in hiring, advancement, or daily operations. Upholding this standard isn’t just the right thing to do, it’s essential to building resilient, high-performing organizations in an increasingly interconnected world.

Workplace Equity Through the Law: Why EEO Still Matters

By Michael J. Bradley, Ph.D. & Mary Boujade

References

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2023). Overview of EEO Laws. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/

McKinsey & Company. (2020). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-wins-how-inclusion-matters

Hilton. (2023). Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging. https://www.hilton.com/en/corporate/diversity-inclusion/

Delta Air Lines. (2023). Equity and Opportunity at Delta. https://www.delta.com/us/en/about-delta/equity-and-opportunity

Greenhouse. (2023). Structured Hiring and Reporting Tools. https://www.greenhouse.io/

Optimized Keywords (max 20):

equal opportunity, workplace equity, hospitality industry, workforce diversity, ADA, Civil Rights Act, inclusive hiring, employee retention, HR policy, FMLA, Equal Pay Act, workplace inclusion, Title VII, EEOC, recruitment strategies, guest service, hospitality ethics, tourism workforce, professional development, staff training

Collaborative Learning in Action: Highlights from SORP’s Virtual VUM Foundations Training

Wed, 29 Oct 2025 03:31:55 GMT

This September, SORP hosted its first-ever virtual delivery of the Visitor Use Management (VUM) Foundations Training, bringing together participants from across agencies and landscapes. While many virtual trainings risk becoming passive viewing sessions, this one was intentionally designed as a working environment rather than just a sit-and-watch experience.

Each day balanced presentations with collaborative scenario work. Participants were divided into groups and assigned one of five case studies, ranging from managing high visitation at popular trails, to planning first-time infrastructure at small preserves, to addressing user conflicts and unauthorized trail building in urban parks.

Rather than simply learning about the VUM Framework, participants actively practiced it. In small groups, they developed desired conditions, selected indicators and thresholds, discussed monitoring strategies, and evaluated conditions. The conversations often echoed familiar real-world dilemmas: How far is “too far” when it comes to visitor impacts? Where is the line between acceptable change and the need for intervention? How do agencies defend these decisions in complex contexts?

A highlight came on the final day when groups debriefed their scenarios using shared whiteboards. Some drafted process maps, others took highly creative approaches and sketched scenes from their scenarios. The activity showcased not only the versatility of the VUM framework, but also how differently methods are interpreted across settings, user groups, and agency cultures.

More than anything, the training reinforced a growing recognition across the field: visitor use challenges are shared, even when management structures differ. Participants frequently remarked on how familiar the scenarios felt to their own work, even when set in completely different environments.

That sense of alignment is exactly what VUM Foundations aims to build. Beyond skill development, the training contributes to a broader shift toward more consistent and collaborative approaches to visitor use management. While adopting shared guidelines is not always simple - given differing mandates, internal systems, and cultural norms - progress often begins not with policy change, but with practitioners who choose to integrate common language and processes into their everyday planning.

SORP extends appreciation to the trainers, facilitators, and participants who contributed to such an engaging and thoughtful experience. VUM is challenging work, but it is also hopeful work. Training like this continues to demonstrate that no one has to navigate it alone.

Making Meaning: The Role of Interpretation in Connecting People and Parks

Mon, 13 Oct 2025 03:29:47 GMT

Like a fingerprint, every park and community possesses unique characteristics that distinguish them, each shaped by distinct histories, cultures, demographics, and natural environments. Yet, despite their individuality, common threads connect these places across neighborhoods, states, and even continents. It is the role of interpreters, whether in parks, museums, or classrooms, to illuminate those connections, helping people understand and deepen their relationships with the places they visit. According to the National Park Service’s Foundations of Interpretation: Curriculum Content Narrative, interpretation does not have a single, rigid definition. Rather, it draws from key ideas and practices developed by thought leaders in the field of tourism and heritage education. The curriculum outlines interpretation as the act of connecting what is being presented to something meaningful within the visitor’s own experience. Effective interpretation is pleasurable, relevant, well, organized, and anchored by a clear theme. More importantly, it transcends surface, level facts, offering deeper truths that help visitors see themselves reflected in a site’s history, purpose, or environment.

For instance, at Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site in Arkansas, interpreters don't just tell the story of the Little Rock Nine, they help visitors connect that history to ongoing struggles for civil rights today. By drawing parallels between the past and the present, interpreters ensure that history is not just a story of what happened, but a call to action about what can still be done. Interpretation is the vital bridge between a resource, be it a historic structure, scenic overlook, or museum exhibit, and the people who encounter it. It ties the past, present, and future together, helping individuals not only learn about a place but also feel a sense of belonging within it. This connection, when done well, creates lasting memories and encourages repeat visitation, bolstering public support and long, term stewardship of the resource.

Major public destinations like the Great Smoky Mountains and Congaree National Park draw diverse audiences from around the globe. These visitors bring with them varied backgrounds, beliefs, languages, and expectations. An effective interpreter helps every visitor, no matter their identity or origin, see why a butterfly garden, plantation house, or mountain trail holds meaning not just locally, but universally. For example, at Congaree National Park in South Carolina, rangers facilitate canoe trips through the floodplain forest. Along the way, they explain how enslaved Africans once used the river for transportation and refuge. Visitors leave with not only an appreciation for the natural beauty but a deeper understanding of the park’s historical and cultural context.

Interpretation is far more than regurgitating facts. It’s not enough to state that a site was founded in 1892 or that a species is endangered. True interpretation reveals why that history matters, how it connects to the lives of visitors, and what actions people might take as a result of what they've learned. A skilled interpreter captivates, provokes thought, and invites emotional engagement. Take the example of Yellowstone’s wolf reintroduction program. Interpreters there don’t just explain the ecological mechanics of trophic cascades. They talk about the political and cultural debates, the changes in elk populations, and the perspectives of ranchers and environmentalists alike. This multilayered storytelling helps visitors understand that conservation is complex, and that they have a stake in it.

While interpretation is essential in places like parks and cultural sites, its value extends into classrooms. Teachers act as interpreters too, bridging subject matter and student life. When learners understand the relevance of a lesson, they are more likely to engage deeply and retain the knowledge. Like a ranger translating the significance of a Civil War battlefield or an ecologist interpreting a wetland, educators help students see the “why” behind the “what.” For instance, an environmental science teacher might use a school garden to teach about ecosystems. Rather than reading from a textbook, students observe plant growth, track pollinators, and learn about composting. This hands, on interpretation deepens comprehension and instills environmental stewardship.

Ultimately, interpretation empowers people to find their place within a broader narrative. It helps visitors not only see a site, but feel it. Whether walking through a national park, exploring a historical landmark, or sitting in a classroom, people crave connections that enrich their lives and expand their understanding of the world. Interpretation is the thread that weaves those connections into lasting impressions.

References

Bacher, K., Baltrus, A., Barrie, B., Bliss, K., Cardea, D., Chandler, L., … Lacome, B. (2007, March 1). Foundations of Interpretation. National Park Service. https://www.nps.gov/idp/interp/101/foundationscurriculum.pdf

Making Meaning: The Role of Interpretation in Connecting People and Parks
By Callie McMullin & Michael J. Bradley

From Green Spaces to Thriving Places: The Case for More Parks

Mon, 15 Sep 2025 03:28:32 GMT

From Green Spaces to Thriving Places: The Case for More Parks

Authors: Katie Adkins & Michael Bradley

Why We Need to Invest in Community Parks and Recreation

Community parks and recreational spaces are more than just nice-to-haves—they’re essential to the vitality, health, and happiness of our neighborhoods. These green spaces provide room for relaxation, play, physical activity, and social connections. Simply put, they’re key to building stronger, healthier communities. Yet, despite their many benefits, parks often compete with other local needs for funding. To secure more investment in these vital spaces, we need to shine a brighter spotlight on the physical, mental, environmental, and economic value they bring.

Parks and the Environment

In an age where environmental concerns are top of mind, parks offer a simple, sustainable solution. They serve as critical green spaces that help reduce pollution, mitigate urban heat, and promote biodiversity. Parks absorb stormwater, provide shade, and reduce air pollution—helping communities combat the effects of climate change. They also serve as habitats for wildlife and green corridors that link fragmented ecosystems. As towns and cities search for environmentally sound strategies, parks should be seen as frontline assets in sustainability and climate resilience efforts.

The Economic Boost of Parks

Parks are powerful economic drivers. From hosting community events and recreational programs to attracting tourists and new residents, parks stimulate local economies in measurable ways. They increase nearby property values, support local businesses, and generate revenue through events, concessions, and programs. Parks also help attract and retain a skilled workforce by contributing to quality of life—a growing factor in economic development. Framing parks as long-term investments rather than expenses can help communities make the case for more funding and support.

Parks = Better Health

One of the most compelling reasons to invest in parks is their impact on physical and mental health. Parks offer spaces for free, accessible exercise—from walking paths and sports fields to outdoor gyms and nature trails. For families, playgrounds support childhood development and encourage healthy activity. In underserved areas, parks may be one of the few places for safe and affordable recreation. Research consistently links access to parks with increased physical activity (Cohen et al., 2007) and improved mental health outcomes (Mullenbach et al., 2018). These health benefits reduce public health costs and improve overall community well-being.

Building Stronger Communities

Parks are places where people connect. Whether it’s a summer concert series, a farmers market, or a casual meet-up on the walking trail, parks foster a sense of belonging. They provide neutral ground for social interaction, civic engagement, and intergenerational gathering. Parks help reduce social isolation, build trust, and create shared community pride. By investing in these shared spaces, communities invest in their own cohesion, resilience, and identity.

Telling the Story

To advocate for parks, we must tell the full story of their impact. This means highlighting not just how green they are—but how they shape our daily lives, support local economies, safeguard the environment, and connect people. Personal stories, data, and images of thriving parks can all help make a compelling case. When parks are seen as core infrastructure for thriving communities, they will no longer be considered optional.

About the Authors

Katie Adkins is a graduate of the master’s program in Recreation and Park Administration at Eastern Kentucky University. She currently serves as the Athletics Video Coordinator for EKU Athletic. LinkedIn Profile

Michael J. Bradley, Ph.D. is the Dean of Research and Graduate Studies at Arkansas Tech University. His work focuses on outdoor recreation, community-based tourism, and sustainable economic development. He is especially passionate about connecting people to nature, supporting rural resilience, and advancing outdoor recreation as a tool for both education and economic transformation. LinkedIn Profile

Poultney, VT, Hosts Inclusive Spaces Training and Workshop

Fri, 12 Sep 2025 03:26:23 GMT

It doesn’t take long to recognize the charm of the small Vermont town of Poultney. Located in southwest Vermont on the New York border, Poultney has a historic downtown filled with small businesses, Victorian-style homes, and community gathering spaces. The D&H Railroad runs through the center of town and is a symbol of both Poultney’s industrial past of slate quarries and its outdoor recreation future as a trail hub. The railroad is now the D&H Rail Trail and Poultney is the home base of Slate Valley Trails, a nonprofit that manages more than 60 miles of hiking and biking trails. Poultney is also navigating recent challenges including the closure of Green Mountain College that served as the community’s economic anchor for over 150 years. In 2021, Poultney finalized its Community Action Plan as part of the Recreation Economy for Rural Communities (RERC) program. Community members also developed a Poultney Town to Trails plan as an outcome of the RERC action plan. So hosting the Inclusive Spaces Training and Workshop in Poultney was an obvious choice when SORP received a grant from the Vermont Outdoor Recreation Economic Collaborative (VOREC).

The VOREC Community Grant Program funds community projects that leverage outdoor recreation. SORP applied for and was awarded a grant in 2024 to help increase participation in outdoor recreation for all demographics. In addition to the one-day Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop, the grant included funding for a train-the-trainer program. The purpose of the training was to support recreation managers, nonprofit program managers, volunteers, and community leaders to conduct audit workshops with their colleagues and partners.

The Training

August is back to school time for many areas so we joined in the tradition by hosting the training at the Poultney High School library. For most training participants, this was the first time they had been in a high school library in many years! The library was large and comfortable and the high school staff were warm and welcoming.

Twelve people from Vermont, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Oregon gathered to learn how to deliver an Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop. The morning focused on the development of the inclusive spaces audit framework, the perspectives and lenses we bring to our work, and the history of public lands and how some places were designed to be inaccessible and exclusive. Participants shared examples from their own experiences of how outdoor spaces can feel unwelcoming to different audiences.

After lunch, we practiced techniques to encourage dialogue and methods to help people feel comfortable sharing sometimes vulnerable information with each other. Small groups showed their creativity by using drawings and a skit to demonstrate the commonalities in how they facilitate conversations.

Then it was time to get on a trail! Jeff Alexander and his team at Vermont Adaptive brought adaptive and non-adaptive mountain bikes for participants to try. After discussing the different types of adaptive bikes and how they are fitted to individuals’ needs, we rode the D&H Rail Trail to the New York border (1.5 miles). Along the way, we talked about how perspective shifts based on how you experience the world. Hand-pedaling a bike while on your chest and stomach is very different from sitting upright.

The day ended with an informal gathering at the Poultney Pub located right on the trail. Von Trapp Brewing created a Vermont Adaptive beer and graciously bought the first round of drinks for us. Participants got to know each other better and hit refresh in preparation for the Audit Workshop.

The Audit Workshop

On Day 2, another 16 people joined us for the Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop. Gerry James of Outdoor Recreation Design Lab created the inclusive spaces audit based on years of research and empirical testing with outdoor spaces and communities in Tennessee and Kentucky. The audit consists of two tools: a pre-observation data gathering worksheet that examines policies, practices, and images for an outdoor space and the field observation worksheet that is used to document observations about how people interact with an outdoor space. Outdoor spaces include trails, trailheads, campgrounds, marinas, and playgrounds as well as community infrastructure that support access to the outdoors such as visitor centers, downtowns, gear and rental shops, and transportation hubs.

After learning about and practicing the pre-observation data gathering worksheet, participants broke into two groups to practice field observations. The first group was led by Sarah Pelkey, the Community Development Director for Poultney. Sarah showed the group outdoor gathering spots including the senior center and the village square. She also introduced them to outdoor business owners. The group discussed some of the opportunities to make Poultney more welcoming and accessible including better sidewalk connectivity, enhanced wayfinding, and places for visitors to get information.

Jeff Alexander took the second group to the D&H Rail Trail. The group looked at the trail kiosk and met with xxxxx from Slate Valley Trails. They walked two blocks to the trailhead and parking area and discussed ways to improve connectivity and awareness of the trails around Poultney. Jeff also brought up the challenges of managing access to the rail trail. Gates are used to limit summer motorized use but they also make it difficult for adaptive bikes to get on the trail.

The workshop wrapped up back at the high school with a report out from each group. Participants then worked together to create an action plan based on the audit. During the closeout and reflection, attendees expressed gratitude for having a framework to talk to others about access, belonging, and inclusion in the outdoors.

Train-the Trainer Next Steps

On the last day, train-the-trainer participants convened for a half day to identify tangible strategies and resources for conducting an audit workshop. Small groups conducted mini-workshops using real-world scenarios. The training wrapped up with a discussion of the workbook resources for conducting an inclusive spaces audit as well as an extensive list of webinars, podcasts, and research for further learning.

Training participants will continue working together as a cohort for the next year. We will host quarterly meetings with the cohort to share best practices, discuss challenges, and support each other in conducting audit workshops.

Interested in hosting an Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop? Contact Rachel Franchina to help you find a trainer near you!

Fostering Equity and Access in Recreation

Mon, 18 Aug 2025 03:18:39 GMT

Fostering Equity and Access in Recreation

Andy Beichler & Michael J. Bradley

Introduction

Recreation plays a vital role in supporting physical and mental health, yet social and economic barriers often prevent equal access for all. This disparity highlights the need for fair and thoughtful approaches in the recreation profession. By ensuring that recreation opportunities reflect and respond to the needs of a broad range of community members, practitioners can not only improve health outcomes but also build a stronger, more resilient industry. This blog explores how recreation providers can create more welcoming environments by evaluating their internal practices and community connections.

Why Fairness and Representation Matter in Recreation

Recreation enhances quality of life—reducing stress, improving mood, fostering social connections, and building physical fitness. But access to these benefits is not equally distributed. Historical injustices, socio-economic challenges, and uneven access to resources have resulted in programs and spaces that may not be welcoming to or reflective of all members of the community. Making intentional efforts to serve a wide range of individuals is essential for ensuring everyone can benefit.

Internal Practices: Workforce and Organizational Culture

Fairness begins within. Recreation organizations must evaluate how they recruit, hire, train, and support staff. Bringing in employees from varied backgrounds helps ensure that programs reflect the experiences and interests of the broader public. Even small departments can take meaningful steps to examine their policies and ensure they provide a supportive environment where all staff have the opportunity to succeed. Wages are also a concern. Recreation workers earn a median annual salary of $34,410—nearly $14,000 below the national average (Harrison et al., 2022). Low pay can limit who can afford to enter or remain in the profession, creating unintentional barriers for those from working-class or historically underserved communities. Addressing compensation gaps is a crucial step toward attracting and retaining staff who bring valuable perspectives and experiences.

Reaching More People: Participation and Program Access

Having staff who reflect a variety of life experiences can help attract a wider group of participants. When people see themselves represented in staff roles, they are more likely to feel welcome and supported. Currently, nearly 70% of outdoor recreation participants are white (Outdoor Industry Association, 2024). Recreation providers can help change that by offering programs designed with different cultural preferences, removing language barriers, and working with local groups to connect with residents who may not feel that these programs are “for them.”

Public agencies have a responsibility to serve all community members. Research by Moore et al. (2008) shows that neighborhoods with more Black, Hispanic, and low-income residents often have fewer parks and recreational opportunities. To address these gaps, agencies should invest in underserved areas, listen to community voices in planning efforts, and work to eliminate systemic obstacles to participation.

Welcoming People with Disabilities

Ensuring that people with disabilities can participate fully in recreation is equally important. Whether mobility-related, sensory-based, or cognitive in nature, these challenges should not be barriers to experiencing the benefits of outdoor play, leisure, and connection. However, only one-third of individuals with disabilities take part in leisure activities, compared to 50% of the general population (National Center for Health Statistics, 2010). Meeting this need requires thoughtful facility design, adaptive programs, and staff training.

Private Recreation Providers: Why This Matters for Business

Recreation providers in the private sector also benefit from reaching a broader customer base. Making programs and services appealing and accessible to more people isn’t just the right thing to do—it’s good business. For example, tennis participation among African American players rose 46% from 2019 to 2021 (USTA, 2023). This shows that when companies make an effort to remove barriers and extend a genuine welcome, participation grows.

A Call to Action: Expanding the Circle

Creating a more open and responsive recreation environment requires more than a one-time effort—it’s an ongoing process. Recreation professionals should consistently ask: Who is not showing up? Why? What can we do to better serve them? By building programs, policies, and outreach strategies that welcome a broader mix of people, agencies and organizations make recreation stronger for everyone. They also expand the base of support needed to protect parks, programs, and public resources from future challenges. When more voices feel ownership of these spaces, the community—and the profession—becomes more resilient.

References

Harrison, D.L., Scruggs, C.J., Hendrick, M.L., Caraway, J.K., Morales, B., Jones, J.M. Kane, B.J., Perkins, I.M., & Zajchowski, C.A.B. (2022) Contemporary issues, opportunities, and resources for the U.S. outdoor recreation profession. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100560

Moore, L.V., Diez Roux, A.V. , Evanson, K.R., McGinn, A.P., & Brines, S.J. (2008) Availability of recreational resources in minority and low socioeconomic status areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(1), 16-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.021

National Center for Health Statistics. (2010). Healthy people 2010. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2010.htm

Outdoor Industry Association. (2024, June 18). Outdoor participation hits record levels for ninth consecutive year [Press Release]. https://outdoorindustry.org/press-release/outdoor-participation-hits-record-levels-for-ninth-consecutive-year/

United States Tennis Association. (2023, March 6). Surge in tennis participation led by growth in ethnic diversity [Press release]. https://www.usta.com/en/home/stay-current/southerncalifornia/surge-in-tennis-participation-led-by-growth-in-ethnic-diversity.html#tab=tournaments

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023, May). Occupational employment and wage statistics. United States Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes399032.htm

About the Authors

Andy Beichler is the Associate Director of Community Results for Partners for Rural Impact in Berea, Kentucky. He is passionate about ensuring that everyone has access to the places they love through outdoor recreation and tourism. LinkedIn Profile

Michael J. Bradley, Ph.D. serves as the Dean of Research and Graduate Studies at Arkansas Tech University. His work focuses on outdoor recreation, community-based tourism, and sustainable economic development. His work emphasizes the role of trails, public lands, and place-based strategies in revitalizing rural communities. Bradley is especially passionate about connecting people to nature, supporting rural resilience, and advancing outdoor recreation as a tool for both education and economic transformation. LinkedIn Profile

The Importance of Environmental Stewardship Education

Mon, 14 Jul 2025 03:15:49 GMT

The Importance of Environmental Stewardship Education

Authors: Michael Bradley & Cody Korson

Introduction

As more people flock to the outdoors for recreation and respite, the need to protect and sustain these natural spaces becomes increasingly urgent. Outdoor spaces provide countless physical, mental, and social health benefits, but they are not limitless. The Leave No Trace (LNT) principles offer a foundational framework for minimizing human impact and promoting a culture of environmental stewardship. As more people explore trails, campgrounds, rivers, and backcountry terrain, ensuring they do so responsibly becomes critical to preserving access for future generations. This post explores the vital role of LNT education in preserving ecosystems, ensuring sustainable recreation, and inspiring long-term conservation behaviors among outdoor users.

Why It Matters

Ecosystems today are under immense pressure from human activity, including pollution, habitat loss, and climate change. With the global population expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 (United Nations, 2021), the demand for natural resources—and places to enjoy nature—will only grow. Outdoor recreation, while beneficial for health and well-being, brings with it a real risk of ecological degradation if not practiced responsibly. Visitors often underestimate the cumulative impact of their individual actions—trampling vegetation, disturbing wildlife, or leaving behind litter—that can lead to lasting harm over time. That’s where Leave No Trace principles come in. LNT is a set of seven guidelines: plan ahead and prepare, travel and camp on durable surfaces, dispose of waste properly, leave what you find, minimize campfire impacts, respect wildlife, and be considerate of others. These principles teach people how to reduce their environmental footprint while enjoying the outdoors. They also foster a mindset of respect—toward nature, other visitors, and future users.

Recreation Trends and Responsibilities

A 2020 report by the Outdoor Industry Association found that more than half of Americans participated in outdoor recreation in 2019—a number that has only grown since the pandemic, which spurred even more people to seek safe and socially distanced activities outside. While this surge in outdoor interest is encouraging, it places increased pressure on public lands, trails, and natural resources. LNT education supports sustainable recreation by showing how individual actions—such as staying on trails or packing out trash—can collectively protect fragile ecosystems. When taught effectively, these principles empower outdoor enthusiasts to enjoy nature while preserving it for others. Moreover, LNT can serve as a unifying philosophy among diverse users, whether they are hikers, mountain bikers, anglers, or campers. Promoting a shared code of ethics builds community and reduces conflict among recreationists.

Cultivating a Stewardship Ethic

LNT education goes beyond teaching outdoor etiquette; it cultivates a mindset of responsibility and care. According to the National Park Service (2019), stewardship begins with a sense of connection to place. Programs that involve people in conservation efforts—such as trail maintenance or wildlife monitoring—can deepen their investment in natural resource protection. These hands-on experiences can be transformative, especially for youth or first-time visitors, providing both practical knowledge and a deeper emotional connection to the environment. Yet, a 2020 survey by the Leave No Trace Center found that while 80% of respondents value the principles, only 54% consistently follow them. This gap highlights the need for stronger outreach and engagement strategies that connect more deeply with diverse audiences. Simply informing people isn’t enough—effective education must inspire behavior chang e.

Broadening the R each

Effective LNT education must be inclusive and adaptive. That means using digital media to reach younger generations, tailoring messages to different cultural contexts, and making information accessible to novice and seasoned users alike. Social media campaigns, interactive apps, and engaging video content can extend the reach and impact of these messages. For example, storytelling campaigns that highlight local outdoor stewards or user-generated videos that model good LNT behavior can humanize the message and make it more relatable. Urban recreation areas, which often serve as gateways to nature for diverse populations, are especially important places to emphasize these principles. Collaboration is also key. Government agencies, nonprofits, outdoor retailers, and schools all have a role to play in advancing stewardship education. By working together, these groups can integrate LNT messaging into programming, signage, gear sales, and curricula. Retailers can display LNT reminders in stores, while schools and camps can embed the principles into youth programs, reinforcing lifelong stewardship habits.

Looking Ahead

The future of outdoor recreation—and the health of the planet—depends on our collective commitment to stewardship. The Leave No Trace principles provide an essential guide, but education must remain a priority. As outdoor participation becomes more mainstream, the need for responsible use grows more urgent. Expanding access to LNT education, promoting community engagement, and fostering cross-sector partnerships will be essential in ensuring that environmental ethics are deeply embedded in outdoor culture. These efforts not only safeguard natural areas but also enhance visitor experiences, making the outdoors more accessible, enjoyable, and sustainable for all.

Further Reading:

World Population Projections

National Park Service - Chapter 4: Natural Resource Management

Webinar: 2025 Retail Sales Trends and Forecasts

LNT: The 7 Principles

About the Authors

Cody Korson is a graduate student in Recreation and Park Administration at Eastern Kentucky University. His academic interests focus on outdoor recreation, adventure recreation, and environmental education. LinkedIn Profile

Building Skills, Sharing Knowledge: 2025 Visitor Use Management Training and Symposium Recap

Tue, 17 Jun 2025 03:13:31 GMT

From June 2–5, 2025, more than 100 outdoor recreation professionals, planners, managers, and researchers gathered in downtown Vancouver, Washington for a four-day event focused on the art and science of Visitor Use Management (VUM). Hosted at the Hilton Vancouver Washington and supported by sunny skies and light morning mists, the event included a two-day immersive training, a full-day symposium, and field workshops in some of the region’s most iconic landscapes.

The VUM Training: Foundations First

The event launched on June 2 with the Foundations of Visitor Use Management training, which brought together approximately 80 participants from across the U.S., Canada, and even Ireland. This engaging two-day training introduced the core principles of the VUM Framework through six interconnected sessions, hands-on activities, and in-depth discussions about defining and managing for desired future conditions in recreation settings.

Working in small groups, participants tackled realistic planning scenarios - navigating constraints, weighing trade-offs, and exploring how to balance high-quality visitor experiences with resource protection.

After a full day of learning and collaboration, attendees gathered for a relaxed networking happy hour at Loowit Brewing’s downtown pub. With the sun setting over the Columbia River, it was the perfect backdrop for casual conversation, connection, and plenty of fries.

Keynote Dinner & Raffle: Centering Tribal Voices

On the evening of June 3, participants gathered for a keynote dinner that spotlighted one of the most pressing issues in outdoor recreation today: the need for more culturally sensitive and sustainable approaches to managing recreation on Tribal lands. Cecilia Gobin (Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission and member of the Tulalip Tribes), Peter Herzog (Washington State Parks), and Andrea Thorpe (Washington State Parks) shared insights from their work on the State-Tribal Recreation Impacts Initiative (STRII), a collaborative effort responding to years of Tribal advocacy for a more inclusive, respectful, and effective framework for addressing recreation impacts on state-managed lands.

Their conversation explored how STRII is helping to reimagine recreation planning through a co-stewardship lens - one that centers Tribal sovereignty, recognizes treaty rights, and embraces Indigenous knowledge systems. They also called attention to the limitations of the Visitor Use Management Framework, particularly its grounding in Western planning traditions, and encouraged attendees to think beyond standard models toward more holistic approaches. The evening closed with a lively raffle, adding a bit of celebration to a night rooted in powerful reflection and connection.

The VUM Symposium: A Day of Dialogue

The June 4 Symposium welcomed over 100 attendees for a full day of presentations, discussion, and knowledge exchange. The day began with a powerful plenary on Tribal Rights and Co-stewardship, grounding the event in the understanding that all visitor use planning must acknowledge and uphold Tribal sovereignty. From there, participants had the opportunity to dive deep into topics ranging from monitoring strategies in British Columbia to planning efforts on the Appalachian Trail. With 17 sessions across three themed tracks - VUM Application, Long-Distance Trails and Protected Areas, and Regional and Local Planning - participants explored practical case studies and emerging strategies from across North America. The sessions offered space not just to share what’s working, but to examine persistent challenges and inspire new collaborations.

Field Workshops: Learning from the Landscape

The final day, June 5, took participants out into the field to experience visitor use management in action. Attendees selected one of three field workshops:

Pacific Crest Trail: Focused on balancing thru-hiker needs with resource protection.
Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area: Explored management of high-visitation sites, trail erosion, and scenic values.
Silver Star Recreation Area: Examined varied access, ecological sensitivity, and sustainable trail design.

Each workshop offered the chance to learn directly from land managers, reflect on the complexities of implementation, and deepen understanding of place-based stewardship.

Looking Ahead

The 2025 Visitor Use Management Training and Symposium was a testament to the collective commitment of planners, managers, and advocates working to ensure that visitor experiences are thoughtfully supported in ways that uphold the integrity of cultural and natural resources. Through shared learning, field immersion, and the centering of Tribal voices, participants left the event better equipped to navigate the real-world decisions that shape recreation planning in their own regions.

For those who couldn’t join in person, or who want to continue deepening their knowledge, a virtual Visitor Use Management training will be held September 16-18, 2025. Stay tuned for registration details, and join us in advancing the dialogue around effective and inclusive visitor use management strategies.

The Significance of Authentic Narratives When Interpreting Slavery

Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:56:35 GMT

The Significance of Authentic Narratives When Interpreting Slavery

Madison Price-Stivers & Michael J. Bradley

Introduction

Heritage tourism is evolving as travelers seek deeper connections to history, culture, and place. Among the most profound topics in this space is the interpretation of slavery, which requires careful, authentic storytelling to honor truth and promote understanding. As interest in genealogy, cultural identity, and historic preservation grows, so does the responsibility of tourism professionals to tell stories with honesty, inclusivity, and integrity. Authentic narratives not only shape visitor perceptions but also influence how communities engage with and learn from their shared histories.

The Imperative of Inclusive Storytelling

The extensive inquiry conducted by Goldmon and Young (2021) into narratives encompassing the descendants of enslaved persons underscores a fundamental issue: selective storytelling distorts historical accuracy. The deliberate omission or marginalization of these voices promotes a superficial engagement with history and undermines the educational potential of heritage tourism. A constrained understanding of socio-cultural dynamics, particularly in places historically marked by injustice, limits opportunities for learning, reflection, and progress.

Case Example: Whitney Plantation (Louisiana)

The Whitney Plantation in Louisiana serves as a model of inclusive storytelling. Unlike traditional plantation tours that romanticize antebellum life, Whitney centers the lives and experiences of the enslaved. Through statues, oral histories, and first-person narratives, it provides a powerful and often emotional visitor experience. It exemplifies a shift toward descendant-informed, justice-focused interpretation.

Dark Tourism and the Ethics of Representation

The growing trend of "dark tourism," which involves visiting sites of historical tragedy and trauma, presents both opportunities and ethical dilemmas. While these sites have the potential to educate and memorialize, they can also commodify suffering when narratives are selective or overly sanitized. Goldmon and Young (2021) argue that this trend, when executed without authenticity and sensitivity, risks perpetuating cycles of marginalization by obscuring the lived experiences of oppressed peoples. Such practices dilute the historical record and miss the chance to foster empathy, healing, and accountability. The financial gains of dark tourism should not outweigh the moral responsibility to present truthful, inclusive narratives. Striking a balance between economic development and historical integrity is crucial.

Case Example: Legacy Museum (Alabama)

The Equal Justice Initiative's Legacy Museum and National Memorial for Peace and Justice in Montgomery, Alabama, sets a standard for responsible dark tourism. Through immersive exhibits and historical documentation, the museum traces the journey from slavery to mass incarceration. It confronts systemic injustice and provides space for education and reflection, demonstrating how historical interpretation can be both ethical and economically impactful.

Collaborative Storytelling as a Model

Goldmon and Young (2021) emphasize collaborative storytelling as a key to developing inclusive narratives. This approach invites descendants, community members, and scholars to contribute, ensuring shared authorship and broader historical accuracy. Rather than imposing a single authoritative narrative, this model encourages the co-creation of meaning through collective memory.

Case Example: Montpelier (Virginia)

Montpelier, the estate of President James Madison, offers a successful example of collaborative storytelling. Through a formal partnership with the Montpelier Descendants Committee, the site's interpretive strategy was reshaped to reflect the stories of those who were enslaved there. This collaborative process produced exhibits that are more honest, comprehensive, and representative of the site's complex history.

Beyond Historic Sites: Inclusive Narratives in Nature and Culture

Though much of the discourse focuses on historical landmarks, the principles of inclusive interpretation apply to natural and cultural resource-based tourism as well. National parks, trail systems, and rural tourism destinations can incorporate underrepresented stories—such as those of Indigenous communities, African American environmentalists, and rural laborers—into their educational signage and programming. Authentic storytelling here helps challenge dominant narratives and broaden our understanding of human interaction with landscapes and environments.

Conclusion

Authentic storytelling in heritage tourism is not merely a best practice—it is an ethical imperative. By confronting hard truths and amplifying historically silenced voices, sites can transform into places of learning, healing, and connection. Through inclusive and collaborative approaches, tourism professionals and communities can foster a deeper understanding of the historical, cultural, and natural landscapes that shape us all. This shift requires conscious effort but yields benefits that transcend economics—educational enrichment, community pride, and cultural healing among them. It is through these authentic narratives that tourism becomes not only a journey through place, but a journey through justice.

Furthe r Reading:

Legacy Museum & National Memorial for Peace and Justice

Whitney Plantation - The Story of Slavery

Montpelier - History Lives at Our House

About the Authors

Madison Price-Stivers is a Visiting Professor in the Department of Parks, Recreation, Exercise, and Sport Science at Eastern Kentucky University. Her primary focus is on therapeutic recreation, but she has contributed to work in heritage and inclusive interpretation through collaborative scholarship and community engagement. LinkedIn Profile

Member Spotlight - Ben Lawhon

Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:53:47 GMT

Designing Better Visitor Experiences: How Ben Lawhon Helps Parks Navigate Change

We’re thrilled to spotlight Ben Lawhon, Founder and Principal of Recreation Solutions Group , and one of the leading voices in visitor use management and outdoor recreation planning.

With over 25 years of conservation and visitor management experience, Ben brings unmatched expertise to his work with parks, protected areas, and communities. For two decades, he served as the Senior Director of Research and Consulting at Leave No Trace , where he led nationally recognized research initiatives and helped shape best practices in low-impact recreation. His contributions include publishing over 22 peer-reviewed articles and serving on the Recreate Responsibly Coalition Steering Committee—a testament to his leadership and dedication to collaborative resource protection.

Ben will be joining SORP’s upcoming webinar, " Career Navigation Tools for Outdoor Professionals ," on August 13 at 1pm MT, where he’ll share lessons learned from his career path and offer strategies for growing a purpose-driven career in the outdoor recreation field.

Reflecting on his journey, Ben shared how SORP became a vital resource during his transition from the nonprofit world to independent consulting:

"After spending more than two decades in the nonprofit sector, where I only peripherally knew of SORP, I discovered its true value when I transitioned to private consulting. Now, as a sole proprietor, I've gained immense professional benefits from SORP's community of practice, including invaluable networking opportunities at two conferences and a VUM workshop that connected me with federal and state land managers, academics, and fellow consultants... SORP has become my primary resource for staying current and advancing my skills as a recreation professional."

We’re honored to have Ben as part of our community and excited to learn from his perspective in the upcoming webinar.

Member Spotlight - Chris Seek

Thu, 29 May 2025 20:52:06 GMT

Bringing Global Vision to Local Outdoor Recreation

With over 20 years of experience across 75 countries, Chris Seek, CEO of Solimar International, has consistently demonstrated how sustainable tourism can be a powerful engine for conservation and economic development. Whether enhancing trails in U.S. National Parks or supporting protected area planning in the Himalayas, Chris has helped ensure that outdoor recreation benefits both people and the planet.

His recent leadership on two projects—one in Colorado and another in Bhutan—illustrates this global-local impact.

In Colorado, Chris led the creation of the state’s first Destination Stewardship Strategic Plan with the Colorado Tourism Office. Over a 15-month process, his team engaged more than 1,000 stakeholders through surveys, workshops, and interviews to shape a statewide and regional vision for sustainable outdoor recreation. The result? A suite of strategic plans that prioritize long-term resilience, accessibility, and a balance between visitation and conservation.

“This wasn’t just about tourism,” says Chris. “It was about ensuring Colorado’s communities and landscapes thrive together.”

Explore the full stewardship plan and learn more about this landmark project at ctostewardship.com .

More recently, Chris collaborated with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the Royal Government of Bhutan to support the development of outdoor recreation visitor facilities across the country’s protected areas. Drawing on lessons from the U.S. and other markets, the project focused on aligning visitor infrastructure with conservation goals in some of the most ecologically and culturally significant areas on earth.

From the Rockies to the Himalayas, Chris’s work exemplifies the power of thoughtful planning, inclusive engagement, and strategic investment in outdoor recreation. His career continues to inspire cross-sector partnerships that make outdoor spaces more welcoming, resilient, and beneficial for all.

Interested in sharing your story? You can share your projects, research, or testimonial here .

Celebrating Leadership Transitions: Thank You to Our Outgoing Board, Welcome to the New

Fri, 23 May 2025 20:50:26 GMT

Thank You to Our Departing Board Members

The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) extends our heartfelt thanks to the board members whose terms have come to a close. Each brought unique expertise, energy, and perspective to our work. As they transition from board service, we are grateful for the ways they have advanced our mission and helped strengthen the outdoor recreation profession.

Michael Bradley – President As SORP President, Dr. Michael Bradley led with professionalism and purpose. His extensive background in outdoor recreation research and natural resource management helped guide the organization through continued growth and innovation.
Mike Hill Mike Hill, a landscape architect with the U.S. Forest Service, brought a creative and equity-focused lens to recreation planning and design. His work emphasized access, inclusion, and cultural relevance in outdoor experiences.
Chris Zajchowski Dr. Chris Zajchowski is a researcher and educator who focuses on the social dimensions of parks and protected areas. His contributions helped SORP stay grounded in evidence-based strategies that support diverse visitor needs and experiences.
Rex Turner With a career rooted in conservation and outdoor recreation planning, Rex Turner provided valuable insights into backcountry management, recreation policy, and stewardship of public lands.
Glenn Haas Dr. Glenn Haas has long been a leader in outdoor recreation planning and policy. His experience in academia and federal collaboration brought strategic vision and a deep understanding of sustainable recreation frameworks.

With Gratitude

We are thankful for the leadership, insight, and dedication each of these individuals brought to SORP. Their work continues to inspire the profession, and we are honored to have had them as part of our board.

“It has been a privilege to work alongside these thoughtful and committed leaders,” said Rachel Franchina (she/her), Executive Director of SORP. “Their dedication to outdoor recreation, equity, and public service has left a lasting impact on our organization and the communities we serve. We wish them the very best in their continued endeavors.”

Thank you, Michael, Mike, Chris, Rex, and Glenn—you’ve helped shape the future of SORP and the profession we love.

Welcoming SORP’s New Board Members and Executive Leadership Team

The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) is excited to welcome our newest board members and introduce our 2025 executive leadership team. These talented professionals bring a range of experiences and perspectives that will help shape the future of outdoor recreation.

“We are thrilled to welcome our new board members and executive leaders,” said Rachel Franchina (she/her), Executive Director of SORP. “Their diverse backgrounds and deep commitment to outdoor recreation will be instrumental in guiding SORP towards continued success and impact in the outdoor industry.”

This next chapter of board leadership builds on that momentum, deepening SORP’s commitment to empowering individuals and organizations advancing outdoor recreation, conservation, and community service.

New Board Members

Kate Porsche – Director, Oregon State University Center for Outdoor Recreation Economy
Mike Ferguson – Assistant Professor, University of New Hampshire
Akiebia Hicks – Connecticut Bureau of Outdoor Recreation; Ph.D., Clemson University; NORC 2022 Scholarship Recipient
Kathryn Wrigley – Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation
Colby Parkinson – Ph.D. Student, Penn State University (Emerging Leader Board Seat)

Highlight: Emerging Leader Board Seat

New this year, SORP has introduced a dedicated Emerging Leader position to ensure early-career professionals have a voice in shaping the organization’s direction. The seat is reserved for individuals under the age of 30 who are either currently students or have fewer than five years of experience in the outdoor recreation field. This role holds the same voting rights and responsibilities as other board members and includes a special focus on mentorship programming and professional development. We are thrilled to welcome Colby Parkinson as the inaugural Emerging Leader.

New Executive Team

Lisa Loukkala – President, Executive Director, Superior Hiking Trail Association
L Fisher – Vice President, Trail Policy Manager, Continental Divide Trail Coalition
Tyler Thompson – Treasurer, Research and Evaluation Analyst, Three Rivers Park District
Monika Derrien, Ph.D. – Secretary, Research Social Scientist, USDA Forest Service
Dakota – Endowment, Recreation Coordinator, City of Boulder Open Space & Mountain Parks

Continuing Board Members

Bess Perry, Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, Michigan State University
Lara Jacobs, Ph.D. – Postdoctoral Researcher, Michigan State University
Whit Patterson – Outdoor Recreation Planner, Bureau of Land Management
Anne Marshall – Recreation Resources Director, Tennessee Parks and Conservation Bureau
Drew Pollak-Bruce – Founder & Principal, CRO Planning + Design

We are inspired by the leadership and service of all our board members and look forward to the collaboration and innovation ahead.

For more information about SORP and its initiatives, please visit www.recpro.org .

Member Spotlight – Etinosa Igunbor

Thu, 15 May 2025 20:48:32 GMT

Mapping the Future of Restoration: How Etinosa Is Bridging Science and Recreation

A recognized leader in ecological restoration and sustainable land use, Etinosa Igunbor is not only advancing science—he’s shaping how we plan, protect, and enjoy outdoor spaces.

Etinosa brings over a decade of experience in environmental and forest management, having led large-scale reforestation and conservation efforts in Nigeria as a Forestry Officer with the Edo State Ministry of Environment and Sustainability. Now, with support from the National Science Foundation, he’s conducting cutting-edge research in the Intermountain West of the United States—an effort that’s yielding actionable insights for land managers and recreation planners alike.

His project, Carbon Sequestration in Restored Ecosystems, uses geospatial modeling, remote sensing, and soil sampling to analyze how restored wet meadows and sagebrush landscapes store carbon. These ecosystems, often overlooked but ecologically critical, are foundational to both biodiversity and outdoor recreation in the American West.

Through this work, Etinosa is identifying the ecological drivers behind carbon accumulation across varied land-use histories and restoration methods. The findings don’t just stay in scientific journals—they’re designed to inform sustainable recreation and conservation decisions at the local level, especially in under-resourced communities. His systems-based, low-cost approach ensures that even communities with limited capacity can benefit from high-impact, science-driven strategies.

“Restored landscapes aren’t just better for the environment—they’re better for people,” says Etinosa. “When we understand how ecosystems function and heal, we can create recreation plans that are both inclusive and sustainable.”

Honored with the SORP New Professional Scholarship Award in 2024, Etinosa is a rising voice in the movement to integrate ecological science with equitable access to nature. His work supports SORP’s mission to connect people, places, and purpose—ensuring that outdoor recreation infrastructure supports environmental resilience for generations to come.

The Economic Impact of Outdoor Recreation in Rural Community Transitions

Tue, 13 May 2025 20:47:00 GMT

The Economic Impact of Outdoor Recreation in Rural Community Transitions

Authors: Liam Funk & Michael J. Bradley

In many parts of the United States, especially in regions long tied to extractive industries, rural communities are undergoing significant economic transitions. As coal mining, logging, and related sectors decline, local leaders and residents are searching for sustainable alternatives that support economic resilience and long-term growth. One promising avenue is outdoor recreation. Outdoor recreation is more than leisure—it’s a powerful economic engine. In places like Central Appalachia, where economic challenges persist, recognizing and harnessing the value of outdoor recreation can help reshape local economies and foster a renewed sense of place.

From Mono-Economies to Diversified Growth

The Appalachian region, known for its breathtaking scenery and outdoor access, has historically relied on single-industry economies. Outdoor recreation, from hiking and paddling to rock climbing and trail running, offers a path forward. Events such as Rocktoberfest not only celebrate outdoor culture but also attract thousands of visitors, infusing local economies with revenue from lodging, food, gas, and retail. This influx of spending supports local businesses, creates jobs, and encourages the growth of service-oriented sectors—all without extracting from the land. For communities once dependent on non-renewable resources, this represents a shift toward sustainable, place-based economic development.

Case in Point: Red River Gorge, Kentucky

Once heavily reliant on extractive industries, the Red River Gorge area has experienced a significant economic transformation. Events like Rocktoberfest draw climbers from across the country, contributing millions in visitor spending. Research has shown that climbers in the region support local restaurants, lodging, and gear shops—helping sustain small businesses and create recreation-linked jobs ( Maples & Bradley, 2021 ).

Another Example: Hatfield–McCoy Trails, West Virginia

In southern West Virginia, a network of ATV trails has injected over $68 million into local economies. Former coal towns are now seeing visitors return, not for mining jobs, but for outdoor adventure and trail tourism—demonstrating the potential for off-road recreation to serve as a durable economic strategy.

Demographics That Drive Investment

Recreation enthusiasts often bring more than their gear—they bring economic potential. Many are college-educated and have disposable income, which can stimulate demand for higher-quality services and amenities. This demographic profile is especially attractive to communities seeking to raise their visibility, improve infrastructure, and invest in long-term development. Understanding these trends allows rural leaders to plan intentionally—ensuring that investments in recreation infrastructure lead to inclusive and locally beneficial outcomes.

Case Study: Bentonville, Arkansas

The development of mountain bike trail systems in Bentonville has catalyzed economic and cultural shifts. The city’s investment in world-class trail infrastructure has not only attracted recreational visitors but also new residents and entrepreneurs. Bentonville’s transformation into an outdoor recreation hub has supported the growth of new businesses, enhanced public amenities, and fueled outdoor-focused educational programs—helping redefine the local economy in the process.

Balancing Access and Stewardship

As recreation use increases, communities and public land managers must consider the balance between access and conservation. More visitors can mean greater wear on trails, natural resources, and community infrastructure. Policies that emphasize responsible use, community engagement, and environmental education are essential for ensuring that outdoor recreation remains a long-term success.

Example: Asheville, North Carolina

Asheville’s redevelopment of its riverfront into greenways and park space, guided by the Wilma Dykeman RiverWay Plan, serves as a national model for balancing environmental stewardship with economic revitalization. This effort has enhanced recreational opportunities while improving environmental health, boosting property values, and fostering community pride. Collaborative planning—among agencies, nonprofits, landowners, and residents—can result in smart growth strategies that protect what makes rural areas special.

Looking Ahead: Policy and Practice

Intentional economic development tied to outdoor recreation can yield substantial benefits—but it must be paired with thoughtful planning and public policy.

Illustration: Fayetteville, West Virginia

Following the New River Gorge’s designation as a national park in 2020, the nearby town of Fayetteville experienced a surge in tourism. While the influx of visitors brought economic benefits, it also led to increased pressure on housing and infrastructure. The town’s experience underscores the importance of proactive planning to mitigate unintended consequences such as displacement or overuse. Fayetteville’s journey illustrates that while outdoor recreation offers opportunity, it also requires governance that is equitable, anticipatory, and community-centered.

Policymakers must take seriously the role outdoor recreation plays in regional development. Investing in trail systems, visitor infrastructure, public access to lands, and conservation partnerships is critical to building vibrant, resilient rural economies. Outdoor recreation is not a silver bullet, but it is a strategic opportunity. Communities that recognize and plan for its economic impact are better positioned for a sustainable future rooted in both people and place.

Additional Reading

Walton Family's Oz Brands galvanizes Arkansas' gravel scene

Park Views: Wilma Dykeman Greenway in Asheville, NC

A Small Town Feels the Impact of a New National Park

About the Authors

Liam Funk is a graduate student in Recreation and Park Administration at Eastern Kentucky University. He is passionate about heritage tourism, community development, and connecting people to place through intentional and inclusive storytelling. Mr. Funk's LinkedIn Profile

Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) Supports '25 in 2025’ Campaign

Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:44:07 GMT

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) is proud to support the ‘25 in 2025’ campaign , an initiative led by the Outdoor Recreation Roundtable (ORR) that challenges states to establish the 25th Office of Outdoor Recreation within the next year. With 24 states already recognizing the vital role of outdoor recreation through dedicated government offices since 2013, this campaign seeks to further the momentum in advancing outdoor recreation policy, economic growth, and community well-being.

SORP Executive Director Rachel Franchina emphasized the significance of this initiative:

“Now more than ever, we recognize the need for sustainable outdoor recreation opportunities, and we stand in full support of ORR's ‘25 in 2025’ campaign. These offices have been instrumental in elevating outdoor recreation as a key economic driver while also improving community health and quality of life. By working together, we can ensure that all states have the resources to create and sustain these vital offices.”

Since Utah established the nation’s first Office of Outdoor Recreation in 2013, nearly half the country has followed suit through executive orders and legislative action. These offices have unified stakeholders, including businesses, educators, and visitors, to advocate for increased investment in outdoor recreation infrastructure, programming, and accessibility. The Confluence of States , a coalition of these offices, has played a key role in fostering a shared national vision for outdoor recreation.

Jessica Wahl Turner, President of the Outdoor Recreation Roundtable, praised the campaign’s launch:

“Few stories highlight the bipartisan significance of outdoor recreation more than the rapid establishment of these offices across 24 states in just over a decade. These offices lead groundbreaking initiatives and investments that generate economic growth, support conservation efforts, and improve public health. We look forward to celebrating the 25th state and recognizing the incredible achievements of current offices.”

As part of the ‘25 in 2025’ campaign, ORR has introduced a new resource: “5 Steps to Create an Office of Outdoor Recreation in Your State.” This tool compiles best practices from states that have successfully launched offices and is accompanied by additional resources, including:

A Guidebook to Developing Offices of Outdoor Recreation
Strategies to Support Offices of Outdoor Recreation
Pathways and Structures for Offices of Outdoor Recreation
The Value of Offices of Outdoor Recreation

In the coming months, ORR will release further research and resources to encourage investment in new and existing offices. The campaign will culminate this fall with an in-person event celebrating the milestone of the 25th state joining the movement.

The ‘25 in 2025’ initiative follows a record-breaking year for the outdoor recreation economy, marked by the passage of the EXPLORE Act—one of the most comprehensive outdoor recreation policy updates in recent history—and a U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis report revealing that the sector generated $1.2 trillion (2.3% of GDP) and 5 million jobs in 2023, reflecting a 36% real-term growth since 2012.

###

ABOUT THE SOCIETY OF OUTDOOR RECREATION PROFESSIONALS

The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) has been serving the outdoor recreation profession since 1983. It is the nation’s leading association of outdoor recreation and related professionals who strive to protect our natural and cultural resources while providing sustainable recreation access. Learn More.

Impacts of Executive Orders on the Outdoor Recreation Community

Fri, 14 Feb 2025 20:42:25 GMT

As a 501(c)3, the Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals strives to support our members and the broader outdoor recreation community regardless of political affiliation. Outdoor recreation has strong bipartisan support in the U.S. The recent passage of the EXPLORE Act and other legislation such as the Great American Outdoors Act are evidence that access to the outdoors are important to people from all walks of life. However, several of President Trump’s Executive Orders (E.O.) and other policies have a great impact on both individuals within our community and the ability for our community to plan, manage and provide outdoor recreation opportunities for all.

More than half of SORP members work for a federal land or water management agency such as the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, or U.S. Forest Service. As a former federal employee myself, I can safely say that any government employee will strongly agree that the agencies can and should be more efficient and strategic in their work. But approaches that are focused on significantly and unilaterally reducing the federal workforce are shortsighted. For example, the February 11 E.O. titled Implementing DOGE Workforce Optimization Initiative includes:

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit a plan to reduce the size of the Federal Government’s workforce through efficiency improvements and attrition (Plan). The Plan shall require that each agency hire no more than one employee for every four employees that depart, consistent with the plan and any applicable exemptions and details provided for in the Plan.
Agency Heads shall promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force (RIFs), consistent with applicable law, and to separate from Federal service temporary employees and reemployed annuitants working in areas that will likely be subject to the RIFs. All offices that perform functions not mandated by statute or other law shall be prioritized in the RIFs, including all agency diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives; all agency initiatives, components, or operations that my Administration suspends or closes; and all components and employees performing functions not mandated by statute or other law who are not typically designated as essential during a lapse in appropriations as provided in the Agency Contingency Plans on the Office of Management and Budget website.

On January 28th federal employees received an email titled “Fork in the Road” encouraging them to resign. Many employees on probationary status (which is put in place for new hires and employees hired under certain authorities even if they are tenured federal employees) started receiving layoff notices on February 13th; the USFS laid off 3,400 employees across all programs and the NPS laid off 1,000 and around 400 for the BLM (this number does not include those that have resigned or retired since Trump took office). And as we know from past furloughs (when federal government funding lapses before Congress passes a budget), essential employees for these agencies only include line officers (such as a forest supervisor or park superintendent), law enforcement officers, and a handful of administrative positions. People who issue special use permits, conduct environment analysis, build and maintain trails, provide educational and interpretive programs, and keep recreation sites and facilities in safe and operable condition are not deemed essential. In addition, the current hiring freezes for both permanent and seasonal federal employees mean that there will be greatly reduced staffing at visitor centers and other positions that directly interact with the public, support health and safety, and respond to accidents and natural disasters including wildfire.

A February 6th presidential memorandum directs each agency to scrutinize federal funding for nonprofit organizations to ensure the funding “shall align future funding decisions with the interests of the United States and with the goals and priorities of my Administration, as expressed in executive actions; as otherwise determined in the judgment of the heads of agencies; and on the basis of applicable authorizing statutes, regulations, and terms.”

What does this mean for the broader outdoor recreation professional community? First, we can expect that some federal recreation facilities and areas will have reduced hours or be closed altogether. Yosemite National Park, for example, has paused reservations for access to the park this summer indefinitely. Beyond reduced government staffing, many federal recreation sites rely on partners, contractors, and concessionaires to operate and maintain these facilities. Without contracting officers and permit administrators to issue and manage the non-governmental activities including payments for services, some of these required operational activities would cease or implement employee layoffs because they cannot pay them. Agency partners such as trail organizations, youth corps, states, county and local governments, and other nonprofits are not guaranteed federal funding that likely depend on to complete operations, maintenance, and stewardship projects. While the funding freeze has been lifted by court order, partners can expect a backlog in processing reimbursement requests for work already completed.

We can also expect an increase in recreation use and demand on state, county and local recreation and trail facilities due to closures. In areas that are difficult to close such as large areas of national forest or BLM lands, we can expect reduced presence and management activities to ensure stewardship of natural and cultural resources. We can anticipate an increase in user conflicts, frustration with inability to access public lands, and an increase in off-trail use, camping in undesignated areas, and unattended campfires. We can expect that the comprehensive assessment of recreation data, accessibility of trails, permitting improvements, and other ways to improve access to outdoor recreation identified in the EXPLORE Act will not be addressed by federal agencies in the near future.

SORP is committed to supporting federal employees, partners, contractors, and nonprofit organizations and raising awareness of the impacts of unilateral government layoffs on outdoor recreation and the environment. We ask that our community do the same thing by talking to your organization about these impacts and taking action to make sure that Congress and policy makers at state and local levels understand how the federal workforce reductions impact access to the outdoors, the outdoor recreation economy, and most importantly conservation of natural and cultural resources. This issue affects all of us, our lands and waters, and the people who have committed themselves to public service.

The View from Above: SORP Executive Director's travels in October

Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:40:14 GMT

I love traveling and usually start planning my next trip before the current one ends, but I knew that spending three out of four weeks away from my family and home would be tough. And it was—especially since I didn’t feel well on two of those trips, and the third involved a serious family distraction (thankfully, all is well now). Still, the traveling was worth it to meet so many people who are passionate about creating memorable outdoor experiences and working together to ensure these resources are sustainably managed. It was also exciting to introduce new people to the Society of Outdoor Recreation Professions (SORP) and brainstorm ways to elevate our work as a profession.

Trip 1: World Trails Conference , Ottawa, ON

Ottawa is an interesting juxtaposition of 1800s Gothic Revival architecture (think Hogwarts-style government buildings), 1960s brutalist buildings (think monolithic with a rigid geometric style and large-scale use of poured concrete), and modern glass towers all mixed in with charming English cottages and craftsman-style homes. As Canada’s capital, it embraces its contrasts including in its parks and trails.

The National Capital Commission (NCC) is a government agency that plans and stewards monuments, parks, and public spaces in and around Ottawa. The 2024 World Trails Conference started with field visits and I joined trail builders, planners and volunteers from across the globe on a hike at Gatineau Park , the National Capital Region’s conservation park. Gatineau Park is the largest green space in the region and the second most visited park in Canada. Like many parks and outdoor recreation spaces, Gatineau Park is challenged with balancing conservation and public access. NCC staff focus on education, stewardship, and restoration. They work with volunteers and trail contractors to prioritize trail maintenance and reconstruction.

The juxtaposition continues in the park with residential homes in or near the park’s boundary and remnants of the industrial era nearly hidden in the park’s natural setting. We visited the Carbide Wilson ruins that sit on the edge of a waterfall. Inventor Thomas “Carbide” Wilson built a fertilizer plan on his land near Meech Lake but the plant never operated. The ruins tell the story of an era when industry and progress dominated the landscape while today visitation and recreation are most visible.

The 2024 World Trails Conference was hosted by the World Trails Network and Trans Canada Trail . Each day started with a keynote panel focused on one of three tracks: Climate and Nature, Regenerative Tourism, and Resilient Trails Sector. Breakout sessions were curated around each day’s theme. I was struck with the similarity in issues regardless of location - New Zealand to Norway, Canada to Kenya. I was also impressed by the passion and commitment that trail champions bring to their work. I heard from volunteers who devote their free time to trail maintenance, nonprofit staff who manage long-distance trails, and agency employees who are committed to making sure trails are part of their community’s identity. I also had great conversations with Canadians who want to connect with other outdoor recreation professionals and see an opportunity for SORP to be more present up North. If you know someone in Canada who could benefit from being a part of the SORP community, send them my w ay!

Trip 2: Basecamp Conference and Workshop, Moab, UT

Moab is one of the most iconic outdoor recreation destinations in the United States. It’s not hard to see why: hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands for almost any outdoor recreation activity imaginable in a high desert setting of towering sandstone cliffs, arches, spires, and canyons. With this draw comes recreation management challenges as well as impacts to a small town of just over 5,000 when more than 3 million people visit each year.

Moab was an obvious choice for the second Basecamp Conference and Workshop hosted by Utah State University’s Institute for Recreation and Tourism . Former SORP board member Dr. Jordan Smith directs the Institute which focuses on research, management, and collaboration to address the challenges and opportunities facing recreation-dependent communities in the Western United States. Basecamp is a regional gathering to share new insights into how to improve outdoor recreation opportunities and protect the communities that enable them. The conference included two separate tracks - outdoor recreation and gateway communities - and a workshop day that brought all participants together.

The outdoor recreation track began with an inspiring keynote from long-time public lands advocate - and former federal employee - Bob Ratcliffe. Bob provided a brief history of recreation management and a challenge for the future: recreation managers must ensure these places are accessible and relevant and well-managed using modern approaches focused on partnerships and collaboration. Breakout sessions featured topics relevant to recreation management: estimating visitation, understanding and monitoring impacts, educating visitors, planning frameworks, community engagement, and data collection and analysis. Several emerging ideas and approaches were presented including using a socio-ecological systems approach for managing recreation, managed access, and managing for visitor experiences.

All of the topics speak to the importance of proactive and sustainable recreation planning and visitor use management (VUM). Given this, SORP hosted a VUM workshop that used the concepts presented in the Wednesday morning Conflict Competence Workshop to foster a discussion among participants about ways to effectively engage multiple perspectives in developing desired conditions. Dr. Lee Cerveny (USFS) and I did a brief presentation about VUM and the VUM Framework while Amy Tendick (NPS) presented a case study for developing desired conditions in Arches National Park and for the river corridors in Canyonlands National Park.

Approximately 40 participants then spent time in breakout group discussions using conflict competence concepts such as interests vs. positions and reframing to better understand diverse perspectives around desired conditions. Key takeaways from the breakout groups included:

Use innovative engagement strategies to hear different voices
Identify stakeholders based on interests
Find shared interests using inquiry
Agencies need to be clear on sideboards and decision space

Three hours was definitely not enough time to talk about visitor use management, desired conditions, and how to more effectively understand different perspectives! I hope anyone who wants to do a deeper dive on these topics can join us June 2-5 in Vancouver, WA, for the Visitor Use Management Training and Symposium where we’ll explore foundational concepts for VUM as well as how we need to evolve recreation planning to be more equitable and inclusive particularly in regards to tribal engagement and treaty rights.

Trip 3: SORP Board Retreat and Great Lakes Outdoor Summit , Duluth, MN

The moment I arrived in Duluth, it was obvious that this city is an Outdoor Recreation Destination. But that hasn’t always been the case. Duluth is the westernmost shipping port on the Great Lakes and has a long industrial history from transportation and mining that continues to be an important part of the region’s identity. However, this history left a lot of scars on the landscape and polluted the waters of Lake Superior and particularly the Saint Louis River estuary to a point it was unsafe for human and non-human species. The area also has a rich indigenous culture anchored by the Fond du Lac band of Ojibwe. In 2024, outdoor recreation on the lands and waters around Duluth are the result of decades of work by the tribe, citizens, and conservation groups to remediate and restore sites impacted by the early to mid-20th century industrial boom.

I knew this place was special before we chose it as the location for the 2026 National Outdoor Recreation Conference . And what makes it so special in the outdoor community that has come together to promote, protect, and provide year-round recreation opportunities.

We held the board retreat in Duluth so SORP leadership could better understand the importance of this place for hosting a conference for our outdoor recreation professional community that highlights an integrated approach to inland coastal management. How the outdoor recreation community in Duluth and the Great Lakes region are responding to challenges such as extreme weather events and years with little to no snow (in an area known for very cold winters) will be key themes for the 2026 NORC.

These and other themes were showcased at the 2024 Great Lakes Outdoor Summit which brought together over 300 outdoor recreation businesses, nonprofits, volunteers, land managers, and interred community members from around the region. The Summit started off with an inspiring keynote from Connor Ryan who is an indigenous activist and professional skier. Connor talked about how he found shared purpose in these two worlds that had previously felt at odds with each other and how anyone - indigenous or not - can honor and connect with place while they are recreating. I encourage you to follow Connor on Instagram @sacredstoke and check out his films!

The rest of the Summit featured breakout sessions, including one featuring myself and SORP board members Dr. Micheal Bradley and Lisa Luokkala (a Duluthian). We got to share our enthusiasm for being a part of professional associations such as SORP. At the end of the Summit, we announced that the Great Lakes Outdoor Summit will partner with SORP for the 2026 National Outdoor Recreation Conference. I couldn’t be more excited to be joining together with such a great group of folks and they are excited to host a well-known event in their community! Conference planning will start in early 2025 so reach out to me if you want to join the planning team.

What’s Next?

Staying at home for a while for sure! Except I already have a road trip planned with my family over Thanksgiving, this time to another outdoor recreation destination, Bentonville, AR, on the way to see family in Little Rock. I spent my teenage years in Ft. Smith, AR, and there was no indication in the 90s that Bentonville would become the mountain bike capital of the world. For SORP, what’s next is continuing to support outdoor recreation professionals from across the U.S. and Canada.

After three weeks of travel, I am inspired by the passion, commitment and adaptability of our community. People want to learn and share so they can make sure all people can get outside and use relevant data and tools to do their best work. They want to be inspired by connecting with others. And I am honored to lead an organization that values the people who plan, manage, and provide outdoor recreation as a public service.

$6.3 Million in VOREC Grants Boost Outdoor Recreation Across Vermont, Supporting 51 Projects

Wed, 05 Jun 2024 20:28:06 GMT

Press Release from https://fpr.vermont.gov/press-release/63-million-vorec-grants-boost-outdoor-recreation-across-vermont

Wed, 05/29/2024 - 12:00

PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release – May 29, 2024

Contact:
Jackie Dagger, VOREC Program Manager
Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation
jackie.dagger@vermont.gov , 802-636-7410

$6.3 Million in VOREC Grants Boost Outdoor Recreation Across Vermont, Supporting 51 Projects

Montpelier, VT – Agency of Natural Resources Secretary Julie Moore and the Vermont Outdoor Recreation Economic Collaborative (VOREC) today announced 51 new recipients of the VOREC Community Grant Program. These projects mark an investment of over $6 million into Vermont’s outdoor recreation economy.

"These grants are an investment in Vermont," said Secretary Moore. "They will help communities revitalize their outdoor recreation assets, create jobs, improve access to nature for Vermonters and visitors alike, and build stronger, more resilient communities for years to come."

Projects awarded in this year’s announcement fall into one of four tracks – Implementation, Project Development, Outdoor Equity, and Flood Recovery. Awarded projects will enhance recreation economies in rural, mid-size and urban communities, lay the groundwork for future community-based projects, expand access to outdoor recreation for all people, and help communities and trail organizations recover from the flooding of summer 2023.

“We are pleased to support so many amazing projects across Vermont,” said Becca Washburn, Chair of the VOREC Steering Committee and Director of Lands Administration and Recreation for the Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation. “The interest in the program, as well as the strength of the applications demonstrates the opportunity communities from Grand Isle to Brattleboro see in investing in the connection between outdoor recreation and economic benefits.”

Awarded projects will support communities in 13 of Vermont’s counties, along with eight statewide projects. Notable projects include:

Vermont Association of Snow Travelers (VAST) for opening almost the entire VAST system after suffering damage during the 2023 flooding.
A coalition of partners led by the Vermont Trails and Greenways Council will be building an accessibility hub for trail users and managers.
Cochran’s Ski Area in Richmond for engineering and design for a new surface lift.
Franklin County Trails Alliance to plan connections from the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail to the St. Albans region.

For the first time, the grant program also encouraged projects focused on outdoor equity to apply to a dedicated funding track. Grant recipient, Arwen Turner, Executive Director of Come Alive Outside, said:

“Come Alive Outside is thrilled to receive funding through the VOREC Community Grant Program’s Outdoor Equity track. This funding supports the continued work of Come Alive Outside’s Outdoors For All Initiative, a collective of organizations, businesses, and advisors with lived experience representing underserved and underrepresented populations in outdoor recreation. This funding will boost the collective’s ability to develop both simple and highly innovative solutions that make accessing the health, wellness, and joy benefits of outdoor activities in Rutland more equitable.”

Governor Scott established the VOREC Steering Committee by executive order in June 2017 to bring together a broad set of outdoor recreation stakeholders to promote stewardship of state recreation assets and market Vermont’s outdoor recreation values and attributes to effectively foster responsible and sustainable economic growth. The VOREC Community Grant Program became one of the first and highest priorities of the committee. This grant round is the program’s fourth and most significant investment in communities across the state.

Learn more about the VOREC Community Grant Program and watch for future funding opportunities.

###

Announcement of 2023 VOREC Community Grant Recipients

ADDISON COUNTY

$ 65,000.00

Blueberry Hill Outdoor Center
Develop a comprehensive strategic plan for the Outdoor Center to ensure its viability as a community recreation hub.

$ 248,231.00

Town of Cornwall
Develop a public recreation area on a parcel abutting the Cornwall Elementary School.

$ 221,500.00

Lincoln Sports, Inc.
Build a multi-use trail system including an ADA-compliant trail and a new parking lot that integrates with Lincoln Sports’ publicly available sports facilities.

$ 63,233.34

Middlebury Area Land Trust
Replace and improve the resilience of trails and infrastructure within Wright Park that were damaged in the summer 2023 floods.

BENNINGTON COUNTY

$ 400,000.00

Manchester Riverwalk Association
Construct an ADA-compliant pedestrian and bike bridge over the Battenkill River.

CALEDONIA COUNTY

$ 192,000.00

Friends of Dog Mountain
Revitalize and sustain the renowned 3-mile trail system on Dog Mountain's 150-acre property.

$ 74,927.00

Kingdom Trail Association
Work with Powered Magazine and the Kingdom East School District to expand access to mountain biking for adults and youth through free-of-charge mountain bike clinics, summer camps, and afterschool programs.

CHITTENDEN COUNTY

$ 80,000.00

Town of Essex
In partnership with Fellowship of the Wheel, implement a scoping study for connecting the Saxon Hill area to the Essex Town Center.

$ 126,500.00

Catamount Outdoor Family Center
Create architectural, engineering and landscaping plans for a new main building at the Catamount Outdoor Family Center.

$ 32,900.00

Cochran's Ski Area
Complete the design, engineering plans and permitting for a new surface lift.

$ 29,286.00

Munt Family Room
Expand and improve outdoor recreation programming at the Munt Family Room for families and children with diverse experiences and backgrounds.

$ 14,000.00

Petra Cliffs Climbing Center and Mountaineering School
Acquire new mobility and adaptive climbing gear for use in Petra Cliffs programming.

$ 204,600.00

Shelburne Farms
Improve accessibility to Shelburne Farms facilities.

$ 14,290.00

Town of Charlotte
Replace the septic system at the Town Beach that failed due to the flooding in summer 2023.

$ 184,650.00

Town of Milton
Add new accessible recreation facilities and multi-lingual universally-designed trail signage to town recreation properties, and develop a marketing and programming plan focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion in Milton’s outdoor recreational spaces.

FRANKLIN COUNTY

$ 42,500.00

Franklin County Trails Alliance
Facilitate a visioning and planning process to connect St. Albans-area recreation facilities to the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail.

$ 159,000.00

The DREAM Project
Expand capacity and build infrastructure to bolster programming at Camp DREAM.

GRAND ISLE COUNTY

$ 57,926.19

Healthy Islands and Community Support
Upgrade the skating rink and oval in North Hero village so that skating can be available through more of the winter season.

LAMOILLE COUNTY

$ 61,310.00

Friends of Stowe Green Mountain Adaptive Sports
Purchase adaptive equipment that allows people with complex disabilities to experience snow sports.

$ 30,266.00

Northern Forest Canoe Trail
Replace and improve the resiliency of two portage trails along the Lamoille River that were damaged in the summer 2023 floods.

$ 27,700.00

Town of Johnson
Conduct a scoping study to assess potential connections from the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail to the Johnson Town Center.

$ 23,095.39

Town of Morristown
Purchase a gear trailer and new gear to replace the outdoor gear available at Oxbow Park that was lost and damaged in the summer 2023 floods.

ORANGE COUNTY

$ 26,682.00

Orange County Restorative Justice
Initiate the Re-Entry Healthy Lifestyles Outdoor Pilot Program, which will offer safe, supportive, substance free, pro-social outdoor programming and recreation for previously incarcerated participants.

$ 48,335.00

Sage Mountain Botanical Sanctuary
Host a weekend gathering for members of Vermont's BIPOC community to learn and share about native plants, wildlife, tracking, hiking, and recreating outdoors.

$ 106,000.00

Town of Bradford
Conduct a master plan for Elizabeth's Park in downtown Bradford.

ORLEANS COUNTY

$ 200,000.00

Newport City Downtown Development
Establish the Newport Outdoor Recreation Collaborative and collectively create and share opportunities for recreation based from downtown Newport.

$ 195,700.00

NorthWoods Stewardship Center
Improve access to Northwoods Stewardship Center facilities, build an All-Persons trail and improve the inclusiveness of NWSC's outdoor education programming.

$ 182,000.00

Town of Glover
Expand infrastructure at Glover Park to include a sensory trail and all-access outdoor play facilities.

RUTLAND COUNTY

$ 298,950.00

Come Alive Outside
Provide capacity and programming support to Come Alive Outside's outdoor equity efforts in Rutland County.

$ 365,680.00

Merck Forest and Farmland Center
Install a universal access trail a boardwalk to connect Mettawee Community School to Merck Forest and Farmland Center's trail network and property.

$ 92,298.50

Smokey House Center
Develop a community-informed plan to revitalize Smokey House’s degraded trail system and design a trail-based community science program.

$ 84,000.00

Town of Killington
Build a critical connection between the Sherburne Parking Lot and Pesky Cairn trails.

WASHINGTON COUNTY

$ 101,860.00

Friends of the Winooski River, Inc.
Conduct a master and design plan for river access in Barre City so that all residents can access and enjoy the Winooski River.

$ 5,261.88

North Branch Nature Center
Repair and make more resilient the recreation infrastructure at North Branch Nature Center that was damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 25,000.00

Norwich University
Repair and make more resilient a mountain bike trail at Shaw Outdoor Center that was damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 14,548.00

Town of Cabot
Restore and improve Cabot's Recreation Field that was damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 75,000.00

Town of Cabot Trails Committee
Replace and make more resilient two bridges in the Cabot Trails network that were damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 49,800.00

Town of Waterbury
Repair and make more resilient a soccer field and playground that were damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 123,762.25

Wrightsville Beach Recreation District
Purchase and outfit a mobile facility for outdoor gear rentals to replace the facilities damaged during the floods of Summer 2023.

WINDHAM COUNTY

$ 227,700.00

Town of Wilmington
Upgrade and improve the accessibility of the Hoot, Toot, and Whistle Rail trail.

$ 58,475.00

Windham Foundation
Conduct an outdoor recreation planning process for the Village of Grafton including connections to trails, the village center and improving accessibility.

WINDSOR COUNTY

$ 100,000.00

Green Mountain Horse Association
Develop a flood mitigation and management plan for the Green Mountain Horse Association’s main campus in South Woodstock.

$ 44,166.00

Hartland Winter Trails
Repair and make more resilient the Hartland Winter Trail system that was damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

STATEWIDE OR MULTIPLE LOCATIONS

$ 21,504.00

Catamount Trail Association
Purchase new ski equipment to sustain and expand Catamount Trail Association's youth learn to ski programs.

$ 196,585.00

CRO Planning & Design
Conduct a recreator survey and economic impact analysis for adaptive recreation in Vermont.

$ 27,500.00

Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals
Design and deliver an Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop for outdoor recreation providers who manage trails, campgrounds, marinas, visitor centers, etc.

$ 226,885.00

Unlikely Riders
Secure a temporary gear closet for BIPOC skiers and riders, conduct a strategic planning process for a permanent base lodge facility and expand the capacity of Unlikely Riders.

$ 317,400.00

Vermont ATV Sportsman's Association
Repair and make more resilient seven sections of trail within the VASA network that were damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 90,887.00

Vermont Association of Snow Travelers
Repair and make more resilient six sections of trail within the VAST network that were damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

$ 644,437.00

Vermont Trails and Greenways Council
In partnership with Vermont Adaptive, Northern Forest Canoe Trail, Vermont Mountain Bike Association, Upper Valley Trails Alliance, and Community Geo, develop a statewide trail accessibility hub and complete detailed trail assessments in order to promote and share high-quality information about trail access across the state.

$ 59,994.95

Vermont Mountain Bike Association
Repair and make more resilient nine sections of trail within the VMBA network that were damaged in the floods of Summer 2023.

Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) Announces New Executive Board

Tue, 28 May 2024 20:23:22 GMT

The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) is proud to unveil the 2024-2025 board of directors. The board members bring a wealth of experience and expertise to their respective roles, embodying SORP's dedication to promoting excellence in the outdoor recreation profession.

The composition of the executive board is as follows:

President: @Michael Bradley , Ph.D. – Department Chair, Arkansas Tech University
Vice President: @Drew Pollak-Bruce – Founder & Principal, CRP Planning + Design
Secretary: @Monika Derrien , Ph.D. - Research Social Scientists, USDA Forest Service
Treasurer: @Lisa Luokkala - Executive Director, Superior Hiking Trail Association

The remainder of the board consists of:

@Anne Marshall – Recreation Resources Director, Tennessee Parks and Conservation Bureau
@Bess Perry , Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, Michigan State University
@Chris Zajchowski , Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, University of Idaho
@Lara Jacobs , Ph.D. – Postdoctoral Researcher, Michigan State University
@Dakota Anderson (He/Him) – Recreation Coordinator, City of Boulder Open Spaces & Mountain Parks
@Glenn Haas , Ph.D. – Principal, Haas and Lovejoy Protected Area Advisors
@Luke Fisher – Trail Policy Manager, Continental Divide Trail Coalition
@Whit Patterson – Outdoor Recreation Planner, Bureau of Land Management
@Michael A. Hill – Program Manager and Landscape Architect, USDA Forest Service
@Rex Turner – Outdoor Recreation Planner, Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands
@Tyler Thompson – Research and Evaluation Analyst, Three Rivers Park District

This esteemed group of professionals will lead SORP in its mission to promote the personal and professional growth of outdoor recreation professionals, provide resources and networking opportunities, and advocate for sustainable recreation practices and conservation efforts.

"We are thrilled to welcome our new executive board members," said @Rachel Franchina (she/her) , Executive Director of SORP. "Their diverse backgrounds and deep commitment to outdoor recreation will be instrumental in guiding SORP towards continued success and impact in the outdoor industry."

The introduction of the 2024-2025 board marks an invigorating phase for SORP, reinforcing its commitment to empower individuals and organizations dedicated to outdoor recreation, conservation, and related endeavors.

For more information about SORP and its initiatives, please visit www.recpro.org.

–

The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) is dedicated to promoting the personal and professional growth of outdoor recreation professionals. SORP provides resources, networking opportunities, and advocacy for individuals and organizations working in outdoor recreation, conservation, and related fields.

Photo from Board Reunion on May 5, 2024

Congratulations to the 2024 Award Winners!

Tue, 14 May 2024 18:07:26 GMT

At the 2024 National Outdoor Recreation Conference (NORC) SORP announced the 2024 National Recreation Resource Leadership, Project Excellence and Individual Service award winners.

The National Recreation Resource Leadership Awardis selected by the SORP Board of Directors to recognize an individual or organization whose career path has had a significant national impact on outdoor recreation and the outdoor recreation profession. The 2024 National Recreation Resource Leadership Award was presented to Deb Haaland, United States Secretary of the Interior.

The 2024 Project Excellence and Individual Service Awards, recognizes outstanding contributions to the outdoor recreation profession. This year's winners are:

Individual Service:

Clement Lau, Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation
Mercy M'fon, Wild Diversity
Michael A. Allen, National Park Service

Project Excellence:

Native Lands - National Trails, Ancestral Lands Conservation Corps
Lake Tahoe Destination Stewardship Plan, Lake Tahoe Destination Stewardship Council
Anza Trail Cultural History Park, National Park Service-Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program (NPS-RTCA)
Youth Outdoor Ambassador Program, Forest Preserves of Cook County
Genesee Valley Trail Towns, Friends of the Genesee Valley Greenway

See the full announcements here.

Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop

Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:05:22 GMT

On December 4, 2023 the Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals (SORP) and Outdoor Recreation Design Lab hosted our second Inclusive Spaces Audit Workshop. Funded by a grant from Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) , the workshop focused on empowering outdoor recreation providers to make their spaces more inclusive and accessible to a broader range of users.

Hosted at Staunton State Park in Pine, Colorado, our second edition of the workshop was expanded from a half-day format to a full day to incorporate time for understanding key concepts and pre-field observations.

Participants were required to submit a short application to attend the free event, which brought over 25 outdoor professionals together for discussion, idea sharing, and observation.

Covering Objectives

Kicking the day off, facilitator Gerry Seavo James (Outdoor Recreation Design Lab/ Explore Kentucky and Sierra Club Outdoors for All ) covered objectives for the day and key terminology. Terminology discussed included nature-based environment, sundown towns and counties, and underrepresented/underserved populations.

Data Gathering + Field Observation Methodology / Pre-Audit Worksheet

Before heading outside for a field observation, participants discussed data important to gather for a pre-assessment of a space.

Participants next worked through the pre-audit worksheet. The worksheet worked through the different information to gather with question such as:

How your unit or organization operates: how are underrepresented people integrated across your staffing, volunteer system, board, or leadership structure?
Understanding who you serve and how they access various sites: do you understand who is currently using your space?
How your marketing and outreach efforts impact inclusivity: how underrepresented people are celebrated and represented in your digital spaces and advertisements?
Discrimination and harassment: has your organization explored the history and culture of the surrounding region and how it might affect how people perceive your space?

Field Observation

Led by facilitators Rachel Franchina (Executive Director of SORP) and Gerry, along with Zach Taylor, Staunton State Park Manager, the workshop participants broke into two groups for field observation.

Groups were asked to observe the park, including the Visitor Center and along the Davis Ponds trail, one of the park’s trails accessible by track-chair . During the observation, participants were guided with a worksheet to answer questions and make notes on their observations.

Share Out

Upon returning to the visitor center, the two groups gathered to debrief on their observations and share which questions were the easiest to answer and which were the most difficult.

Easier elements included general assessments such as all signs were in English and the park could benefit from pictograms or signage in different languages. The park featured auditory educational resources, lots of places to rest, and accessible trails via the track-chair program. Some additional recommendations included a nature play area for children near the pond, installing accessible electric vehicle chargers, adding safe space stickers at the visitor, and more clear and accessible information for trail use geared towards all ages and abilities.

One of the hardest elements participants agreed upon was that all observations were made by recreation professionals and it would be beneficial to bring in the communities to get different perspectives and make more tangible recommendations.

Feedback + Moving Forward

Participants were encouraged to use the resources provided during the day to conduct an audit at their respective outdoor recreation spaces. Shared resources and notes are listed and accessible to all within the SORP DEIA community .

The feedback gathered would serve a dual purpose – contributing to a report for the Colorado Parks and Wildlife grant and aiding in the enhancement of the workshop for future participants.

Interested in participating in our next workshop? SORP and Outdoor Recreation Design Lab are working to plan the next iteration of the event for spring 2024, which will be hosted at a second Colorado State Park, thank you to the CPW grant. Please stay tuned for more information and our application to open.

BLM Blueprint for 21st Century Outdoor Recreation

Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:02:06 GMT

On September 7, 2023, the Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals' Executive Director, Rachel Franchina, participated in a workshop about solutions and actions for implementing the BLM's Blueprint for 21st Century Outdoor Recreation . The workshop was hosted by the BLM's new Congressionally-designated foundation, the Foundation for America's Public Lands . Outdoor recreation is a key focus area for the Foundation and they are committed to supporting the BLM and partners in transforming how people experience outdoor recreation on BLM-managed public lands.

The workshop included a mix of presentations and breakout group discussions. BLM and Foundation leaders talked about why the agency is releasing an outdoor recreation strategy now and how they anticipate it will impact recreation program delivery. The Blueprint emphasizes partnerships as a core approach to modernizing outdoor recreation. Several outdoor recreation leaders participated in panel discussions about building on and expanding partnerships as well as opportunities for new and non-traditional partnerships for improving equitable access to public lands.

Robust breakout group conversations recognized the challenges of the BLM shifting to a holistic approach to outdoor recreation and the internal and external capacity needed to support the shift. While there is excitement about the overall vision and desired outcomes for outdoor recreation managed by the BLM, there is also healthy skepticism about the agency's ability to embrace partnerships in a new way.

For SORP, there are several key areas of integration and ways we can partner with the BLM to support the Blueprint. These include professionalizing outdoor recreation, supporting employee development and training, and incorporating equitable and inclusive access in recreation planning and program delivery. We are looking forward to continued engagement with the BLM, the Foundation, and othe partners in supporting this important paradigm shift for outdoor recreation.

Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals RSS Feed

Toward Shared Stewardship of America’s Public Lands

Toward Shared Stewardship of America’s Public Lands

Moving Beyond Control to Collaboration

What Shifting Public Land Governance Means for Outdoor Recreation Professionals

What Shifting Public Land Governance Means for Outdoor Recreation Professionals

A Field Being Asked to Adapt in Real Time

The Risks of Shifting Public Lands to State Control

The Risks of Shifting Public Lands to State Control

Capacity, Consistency, and the Fragility of Long Term Stewardship

The Case for State Control of Public Lands

The Case for State Control of Public Lands

Local Knowledge, Flexible Management, and the Promise of Expanded Access

Who Should Manage America’s Public Lands?

Who Should Manage America’s Public Lands?

Shifting Authority, Expanding Access, and the Questions We’re Not Asking Enough

Workplace Equity Through the Law: Why EEO Still Matters

Collaborative Learning in Action: Highlights from SORP’s Virtual VUM Foundations Training

Making Meaning: The Role of Interpretation in Connecting People and Parks

References

From Green Spaces to Thriving Places: The Case for More Parks

From Green Spaces to Thriving Places: The Case for More Parks

Why We Need to Invest in Community Parks and Recreation

Parks and the Environment

The Economic Boost of Parks

Parks = Better Health

Building Stronger Communities

Telling the Story

Further Reading

About the Authors

Poultney, VT, Hosts Inclusive Spaces Training and Workshop

The Training

The Audit Workshop

Train-the Trainer Next Steps

Fostering Equity and Access in Recreation

Fostering Equity and Access in Recreation

Introduction

Why Fairness and Representation Matter in Recreation

Internal Practices: Workforce and Organizational Culture

Reaching More People: Participation and Program Access

Welcoming People with Disabilities

Private Recreation Providers: Why This Matters for Business

A Call to Action: Expanding the Circle

References

About the Authors

The Importance of Environmental Stewardship Education

The Importance of Environmental Stewardship Education

About the Authors

Building Skills, Sharing Knowledge: 2025 Visitor Use Management Training and Symposium Recap

The VUM Training: Foundations First

Keynote Dinner & Raffle: Centering Tribal Voices

The VUM Symposium: A Day of Dialogue

Field Workshops: Learning from the Landscape

Looking Ahead

The Significance of Authentic Narratives When Interpreting Slavery

The Significance of Authentic Narratives When Interpreting Slavery

Introduction

The Imperative of Inclusive Storytelling

Dark Tourism and the Ethics of Representation

Collaborative Storytelling as a Model

Beyond Historic Sites: Inclusive Narratives in Nature and Culture

Conclusion

Furthe r Reading:

About the Authors

Member Spotlight - Ben Lawhon

Designing Better Visitor Experiences: How Ben Lawhon Helps Parks Navigate Change

﻿

Member Spotlight - Chris Seek

Bringing Global Vision to Local Outdoor Recreation

Celebrating Leadership Transitions: Thank You to Our Outgoing Board, Welcome to the New

Thank You to Our Departing Board Members

With Gratitude

Welcoming SORP’s New Board Members and Executive Leadership Team

New Board Members

Highlight: Emerging Leader Board Seat

New Executive Team

Continuing Board Members

Member Spotlight – Etinosa Igunbor

Mapping the Future of Restoration: How Etinosa Is Bridging Science and Recreation

The Economic Impact of Outdoor Recreation in Rural Community Transitions